Skip to comments.
NYT Corrections for the Record (DOWD ALERT!)
NYT Fishwrap Corrections Page ^
| 29 July 2008
| NYT Corrections Page
Posted on 07/29/2008 6:05:41 AM PDT by IGOTMINE
"In her column last Wednesday, Maureen Dowd wrote that a Democratic lawmaker privately asked Gen. David Petraeus why there weren’t more Democrats in the military, and he replied, “There are more than you think.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dowd; dowdalert; maureendowd; modo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Imagine that...a falsehood in a Dowd column. I am shocked!
1
posted on
07/29/2008 6:05:41 AM PDT
by
IGOTMINE
To: IGOTMINE
False quote from whole cloth bump!
2
posted on
07/29/2008 6:09:48 AM PDT
by
IGOTMINE
(1911s FOREVER!)
To: IGOTMINE
Fake news for fake people.
3
posted on
07/29/2008 6:09:54 AM PDT
by
Dr. Ursus
(( commander of the simian host))
To: IGOTMINE
In her column last Wednesday, Maureen Dowd wrote that a Democratic lawmaker privately asked Gen. David Petraeus why there weren’t more Democrats in the military, and he replied, “There are more than you think.” Col. Steven Boylan of the general’s public affairs office in Baghdad, which was not contacted for comment, says the quotation “is in error as he never made nor would make such a statement.”
A lot of hearsay, I dare say... Dowd says that a Dem lawmaker said that Petraeus said it. Now the NYT says that Boylan says that Petraeus never said such a thing.
4
posted on
07/29/2008 6:10:21 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: IGOTMINE
Col. Steven Boylan of the general’s public affairs office in Baghdad, which was not contacted for comment, says the quotation MI> “is in error as he never made nor would make such a statement.”................
5
posted on
07/29/2008 6:10:55 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
To: IGOTMINE
6
posted on
07/29/2008 6:11:44 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
To: IGOTMINE
Quite a few corrections on that page. Of course the NYT isn’t concerned about truth, and offers corrections only when called on “errors”. Their only concern is advancing their liberal agenda.
7
posted on
07/29/2008 6:14:13 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: Red Badger
New media has exposed the NY Times as a laughing stock. Rarely does a week go by without something being exposed.
8
posted on
07/29/2008 6:14:17 AM PDT
by
King Hawk
To: IGOTMINE
9
posted on
07/29/2008 6:15:51 AM PDT
by
omega4179
(B.Hussein Keep the change!)
To: Red Badger
RULES!
There you go...
10
posted on
07/29/2008 6:20:09 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(IT'S AN OIL ECONOMY, STUPID!.......................................................(FREE LAZAMATAZ!))
To: gridlock
11
posted on
07/29/2008 6:24:09 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
To: IGOTMINE
If you want to know the NYSlimes’ agenda you must turn to the ‘corrections’ first. You will find that just everything you read in previous editions is now ‘inoperative’.
Further, they have spread their ‘corrections’ throughout the paper so you might miss a few.
12
posted on
07/29/2008 6:25:27 AM PDT
by
Carley
To: gridlock
I had no idea that that you could play golf after major surgery for breast augmentation, varicose veins, a chin lift, and especially after a Rush Limbaugh addadicktome!
13
posted on
07/29/2008 6:25:31 AM PDT
by
Doc Savage
("Are you saying Jesus can't hit a curve ball? - Harris to Cerrano - Major League)
To: Doc Savage
That all you got, Doc?...
14
posted on
07/29/2008 6:30:23 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(IT'S AN OIL ECONOMY, STUPID!.......................................................(FREE LAZAMATAZ!))
To: gridlock
For Real!!! Why do people care so much that they get ANGRY over the fame or fortune of someone else?
15
posted on
07/29/2008 6:38:03 AM PDT
by
mpackard
(Proud mama of a Sailor.)
To: mpackard; gridlock
For Real!!! Why do people care so much that they get ANGRY over the fame or fortune of someone else?
It's what socialists do.
16
posted on
07/29/2008 6:42:21 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Obama-flakes! = Little suntanned Jimmy Carters with twice the empty rhetoric , from DNC cereals!)
To: Red Badger
17
posted on
07/29/2008 6:50:20 AM PDT
by
Huck
(A Teddy Roosevelt wannabe is better than a Che Guevara wannabe.)
To: IGOTMINE
Pravda corrects itself? Who knew!
18
posted on
07/29/2008 7:23:30 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
To: IGOTMINE
19
posted on
07/29/2008 7:28:16 AM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts.....)
To: IGOTMINE
20
posted on
07/29/2008 7:38:05 AM PDT
by
sono
(It's a shame the Republicans took a pass on nominating a candidate for President this year.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
