Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plummeting Resale Values Lead Chrysler to End Leases
New York Times ^ | July 26, 2008 | Nick Bunkley

Posted on 07/26/2008 3:45:10 PM PDT by Zakeet

Chrysler is getting out of the auto leasing business.

The company, now privately held, told its dealers on Friday that its financing arm, Chrysler Financial, would stop offering leases as of Aug. 1, a move that comes as plummeting resale values of gas-thirsty trucks and sport utility vehicles turn lease deals on those vehicles into big money losers for the Detroit automakers.

On Thursday, the Ford Motor Company took a $2.1 billion write-down in the second quarter, part of an $8.7 billion loss for Ford over all, related to unprofitable leases held by its finance arm, the Ford Motor Credit Company.

James E. Press, a co-president of Chrysler, said the carmaker would divert money it had been spending to subsidize leases toward offers that make traditional financing more affordable. He said Chrysler would offer discounts so that many customers who financed a vehicle would end up with about the same monthly payment that they would have had in a lease.

In many instances, Mr. Press said, low interest rates already have made financing more appealing than leasing, and leasing creates more financial risk for the automaker.

“There was a time when leasing was really very attractive,” he said in a conference call with reporters and analysts. “We really reached a point today, in this environment, where the economic advantages of leasing have really disappeared.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; autos; chrysler; leasing; transportation; uaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

At Shuman Motor Sales, a Chrysler and Jeep dealership in Walled Lake, Mich., the general sales manager, Chris Brough, said leases accounted for 85 percent of the dealership’s business. Mr. Brough said ending leases would mean lower volume at first but that the change would make his dealerships and others healthier in the long run. *


* Anybody who really believes this statement should contact me by FreepMail. I would love to sell you the major airport nearest to where you live.

1 posted on 07/26/2008 3:45:11 PM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Sales might be down, but the prices sure aren’t. Not in this town.


2 posted on 07/26/2008 3:46:34 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I’ve never leased anyway - I can’t see how anyone that commutes to work daily and actually has a life can stay under the mileage limitations to make a lease worthwhile.


3 posted on 07/26/2008 3:49:26 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Yup. That’s right up there with, “We welcome the competition”


4 posted on 07/26/2008 3:56:17 PM PDT by Roccus (Someday it'll all make sense.....maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Leasing sucks anyway. I pay cash or I don’t buy.


5 posted on 07/26/2008 3:58:14 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Leases have been a mixed bag for quite some time for finance companies. Some not-so-honest companies were known to pad their “investment” by tacking on fees at the end of the lease term - from “condition adjustments” for non-existent problems, to hidden surrender fees.

The whole concept of a lease is that the combination of lease payments, plus the actual value of the vehicle at the end of the lease will be more than the actual cost of the vehicle to the lease company.

These manufacturer-owned finance companies have been betting on high values, even knowing the values were no-where near what they were betting on. And now, with resale values falling even more than usual, they are getting hung out to dry.


6 posted on 07/26/2008 4:16:57 PM PDT by TheBattman (Vote your conscience, or don't complain about RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

Completely agree. My favourite words are “one owner, off lease” - bought low KM beauts that way for about 25% of the original sticker price. (Having a good mechanic is critical when having them inspected.)

We drove our last ones for over ten years so the trade in was a moot point.


7 posted on 07/26/2008 4:37:34 PM PDT by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The phrase “Used Chrysler” just brings that air of class to your life. ;)


8 posted on 07/26/2008 4:45:24 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I suspect that “Lifetime Powertrain Warranty” will be the next thing to go.


9 posted on 07/26/2008 5:06:54 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The real reason leases aren't "economic" anymore is the deadbeat, teetering auto industry currently has to pay 12% a year to borrow money. If they then lend it out to car buyers at 7%, they won't make it up on volume. In other words, the average car buyer (heck, the average used Chrysler buyer) has better credit at this instant than the big three.

Unions suck. They destroyed our greatest industry. Now they want to elect Obama and destroy our military position in the world, too.

10 posted on 07/26/2008 5:14:09 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Won’t the real losers be the people who leased cars and will now be upside down in them because resale will be down and they won’t be able to roll over their loss into a new lease as they could before.

Most long term leases that made cars/trucks more ‘affordable’ ultimately left the leasee upside down in the car, meaning they couldn’t sell it or turn it back to the company for what they still owed on the lease.


11 posted on 07/26/2008 5:17:13 PM PDT by wildbill ( FR---changing history by erasing it from memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Depends how far is your workplace.I lease 2008 Lexus 250 for my wife.3 years lease,0 down,15K per year,$420.00 a month.Why to spend $30000+ for a car?
12 posted on 07/26/2008 5:51:17 PM PDT by QQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: QQQQ
3 years lease,0 down,15K per year,$420.00 a month

420.00/month x 12 months /year = 4200.00 + 840.00 = 5040.00 /year * 3 years = $15,120.

Then in three years you do it all over again.

At the end of six years you've paid $30,240.

If'd you'd bought the car and spread the payments over six years you'd be in pretty much the same place, except you'd have ownership of the car at that point and could drive it for at least several more years with no payments.

Cheers!

13 posted on 07/26/2008 6:17:18 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I’ve never leased anyway - I can’t see how anyone that commutes to work daily and actually has a life can stay under the mileage limitations to make a lease worthwhile.
*******************************************************
Just send out your odometer for am adjustment before turn in time ... www dashpro com


14 posted on 07/26/2008 8:07:44 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Exactly.

I haven't bought a new vehicle in almost 20 years, but I remember how hard the salesman tried to push a lease at me. I had to say NO three times before he got off it.

15 posted on 07/26/2008 8:08:22 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: QQQQ

When I try to add it up, it seems possible, but in reality it always ends up that I drive 25000 miles per year.


16 posted on 07/26/2008 8:17:57 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

How can you be upside down in a lease?


17 posted on 07/26/2008 8:18:10 PM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Driving too many miles.


18 posted on 07/26/2008 8:20:40 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

OK...but that’s not really being upside down, that’s simply exceeding the terms of the lease.


19 posted on 07/26/2008 8:38:17 PM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

No, that is upside down. You have to pay money at the end of the lease for the extra miles.

For my FORD, the penalty would have been $3,000.

They waived the penalty since I bought the car.

That is UPSIDEDOWN.


20 posted on 07/26/2008 11:20:19 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson