Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Qantas denies rust to blame for emergency landing
Telegraph UK ^ | Last Updated: 5:01PM BST 26 Jul 2008 | By Barbie Dutter in Sydney

Posted on 07/26/2008 12:58:14 PM PDT by Perdogg

Safety concerns were raised as long ago as February about the Qantas aircraft that had to make an emergency landing after a 9ft hole opened up in its fuselage at 29,000 feet, it has emerged.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airlines; airlinesafety; qantas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
They are now considering the possibility that some sort of explosion occurred, but not a bomb.
1 posted on 07/26/2008 12:58:15 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

“..Australian investigators who travelled to Manila are working on a theory that the aircraft may have been damaged by a pressurised container exploding in the hold, or from a broken panel coming loose on the fuselage. Exploding oxygen cylinders are also a possible line of investigation. “


3 posted on 07/26/2008 1:05:44 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

But wasn’t the opening strange for a bomb-like explosion? There were no jagged, crumpled edges on it.

Besides, if it was a bomb, I believe it’s quite easy to do a residue analysis.


4 posted on 07/26/2008 1:13:15 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
No. It wasn't rust. Just recovering from a tarnished image. ;)


5 posted on 07/26/2008 1:24:10 PM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4396805.ece


6 posted on 07/26/2008 1:24:42 PM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Book marked, and watching to see what actually is going to be offered up as happening...BS, or not...


7 posted on 07/26/2008 1:27:58 PM PDT by Issaquahking ("What did you do for America today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
A former head of the NTSB was on the tube last night and said that any aircraft that used on over-the-water routes (as this one was) is very susceptible to corrosion and must be checked carefully...and often.
8 posted on 07/26/2008 1:33:44 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bein ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Qantas denies rust to blame for emergency landing

Oh Good, I just hate those IRON 747's, it the steam engines on the wings that make them so smelly....

What are these people smoking?

9 posted on 07/26/2008 2:32:11 PM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

A lot of aluminum and fiberglass, but not much iron ... or iron oxide.

;-)


10 posted on 07/26/2008 2:36:14 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The problem with aircraft has been the rivets. The skin (aluminum) and rivets are dissimilar metals with the rivets being more nobel. The aluminum corrodes around the rivets and the skin becomes loose until it peals away. Much of the process is not that easy to see with a rapid visual inspection.

Further, in many cases you might see a failure along the rivet perforations much like what may have happened in the Qantas incident. Think of it as perforated paper.

This is just a theory, but I would not be surprised that minimally it was a contributing factor.
11 posted on 07/26/2008 2:47:14 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and Free Laz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Not the skin and frame, but how about the fasteners?? I sure make a lot of steel and stainless fasteners for Boeing.
Jack


12 posted on 07/26/2008 2:48:17 PM PDT by btcusn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Just like TWA 800, this Quantas flight got the infamous “center fuel tank” problem. The center fuel tank was very near this “problem” wasn’t it? That’s it!!! AAHHAA! The Nazis at the NTSB will probably blab this. They are nothing more than stooges. I haven’t flown since 1999 and I have no reason to fly now. Guess what’s next? The USA FLIGHT airline. Isn’t that what Russia did years ago? AEROFLOT.


13 posted on 07/26/2008 2:49:52 PM PDT by hkp123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: btcusn

That is the problem. The steel is galvanically more nobel than aluminum. The aluminum corrodes until the fasteners fail. Think of a rivet hole as becoming bigger and bigger.


14 posted on 07/26/2008 2:55:45 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and Free Laz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

VH-OJK
15 posted on 07/26/2008 3:04:19 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

You must have made your post while I was 2 fingering mine out!! Being at sea for many years I have seen MANY examples of mixed metal corrosion. Maybe make the fasteners out of ZINC?? At least the panels would fall off while still in one piece ;)
Jack


16 posted on 07/26/2008 3:42:07 PM PDT by btcusn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

.......Speculation that rust contributed to the accident was also dismissed ......

Wonder what presstitute idiot speculated about rust in an aluminum air plane? The author is probably the ignorant speculator.


17 posted on 07/26/2008 3:54:28 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

A missing rivet at the wing root would be a decided weakness in the skin. Once a panel opens up a little the windstream could grab it and away it goes.


18 posted on 07/26/2008 3:57:55 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

While failure along the rivet lines is likely from fatigue, I think the rivets re also aluminum and not dissimilar metal subject to galvanic action and corrosion.


19 posted on 07/26/2008 3:58:13 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Once a panel opens up a little the windstream could grab it and away it goes.

Thanks. Slapping myself in the head. I sometimes suffer from "static" thinking. I was only involved professionally speaking from inside a hanger many moons ago. The other times I was praying from inside the plane as a passenger.
20 posted on 07/26/2008 4:17:53 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and Free Laz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson