Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Network Won't Fire Michael Savage
Newsmax ^ | July 24, 2008 | Staff

Posted on 07/24/2008 1:47:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Talk Radio Network, the syndicator of Michael Savage's "Savage Nation" radio show, issued the following statement today:

On Michael Savage's Autism Comments

There have been numerous calls in recent days for Michael Savage, who hosts “The Michael Savage Show” for Talk Radio Network (the “Network”), to be fired or suspended for his brief 84 seconds of commentary concerning autism during the July 16th broadcast of the Show.

Promptly after the Network’s management learned of the comments in issue, the Network commenced an investigation into the particulars and the circumstances of those comments. This investigation began with the Network’s CEO, Mark Masters, personally contacting Dr. Savage to address the concerns and obtain an explanation of the comments directly from Dr. Savage.

In that conversation, and other subsequent conversations between Mr. Masters and Dr. Savage, Dr. Savage explained the circumstances and intent of his statements in considerable detail. The Network also carefully monitored subsequent broadcasts of the Show, on Monday, July 21st and Tuesday, July 22nd, which were devoted to the subject of autism and further explanations by Dr. Savage of his views on the subject.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: autism; medicine; michaelsavage; savage; talkradio; weiner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last
To: whatisthetruth
"Your posts to Lormand seem to always describe him rather aptly, lol."

You guys typify Weiner to the 'T'.

No substance, just stink.

101 posted on 07/28/2008 7:57:53 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
"The correct term is “bald faced liar”. BALD. B - A - L - D. Buy a clue from Vanna."

Nit-picking spelling eh? BTW, I used bold letter, thus the use of "bold faced lier". Most people would get it.

102 posted on 07/28/2008 8:00:34 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth
"With so-called conservatives like Lormand around who needs liberals?"

Rabid Weiner fans think they can yell others off the thread like their messiah, Weiner does to callers on his show. Rabid Weiner fans would not know a Conservative if he were on 3 hours a day, because they confuse one that is on about 3 hours a week from San Fransisco as one.

I guess feeding two poodles is exhaustive work needing lots of time off.

103 posted on 07/28/2008 9:06:41 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
"Being a moron still makes you a moron. Wear it with pride!"

It seems you are an expert on "moron". If I ever chose to be one, I'll become a Weiner fan and consult with you.

" So Savage is an individual and not a gentleman in the Republican club. He’s still a Conservative and you are still a moron."

I figured that when he campaign cash donated money to Liberals. /sarc

I guess pointing this out in your mind "proves" that I am a liberal, not Weiner? Weiner likes to try yelling people off of his show, and Weiner lovers like yourself try the same on threads. It just doesn't work for me as you should no, or will find out eventually.

Weiner will never be known for having any class, and his fans carry the same ill trail.

Only a Weiner fan or an ounce of air plane glue can conclude that Weiner critics are liberals, in spite of a smoking gun.

104 posted on 07/28/2008 9:20:38 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: smedley64; whatisthetruth
The fundamental flaw with Weiner is his constant attacks on other Conservatives. When I first tuned into him, I was a fan for about 2 weeks (yes, I'm a slow learner). I must have been lucky to have missed his attacks on other Conservative talkers at that time, because after a while, I would hear him attack other Conservatives as much as his attacks on "borders, language, culture", Islamofascism, etc.

Then I would notice his inconsistencies in his statements. He would completely contradict himself from day to day. I soon realized that this guy has a real mental problem and an embarrassment to hard core Conservatives like myself.

Probably a good percentage of his listeners are like "rubber neckers" just staring at an accident as they go by.

Another certain percentage of his listeners are real fans who place him on an unjustified pedestal. Some of them are so consumed by their devotion to Weiner that they employ the same classless traits.

105 posted on 07/28/2008 9:31:48 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; lormand
I don’t like to insult anybody and I know FreeRepublic frowns on it. It is just frustrating. Occasionally I run into Freepers so dense or so uninformed, it is just frustrating. They try your patience.

LOL! That makes it even better, you insult not because you want to, but because you have to. Lormand however is not just 'anybody', he led a failed campaign to get the Savage thread kicked off FreeRepublic, he's no different than the fascists from the Left that campaign to get Savage thrown off the air, only he's a fascist from the right. He would be dangerous if he had any real power.

Lormand responds better to insults than to informed reasoning as you can see from his subsequent posts because he works in reverse, the more informed he gets, the more 'dense' he becomes. I don't take him seriously anymore, he's good for the occasional recreational useless tit for tat banter that comes up whenever the issue of Savage comes up on FreeRepublic other than on the daily talkradio Savage thread.

106 posted on 07/28/2008 11:07:44 AM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth
"LOL! That makes it even better, you insult not because you want to, but because you have to. Lormand however is not just 'anybody', he led a failed campaign to get the Savage thread kicked off FreeRepublic, he's no different than the fascists from the Left that campaign to get Savage thrown off the air, only he's a fascist from the right. He would be dangerous if he had any real power."

I see infatuation in your comments, but I'm not flattered. The obvious thing for anyone to notice is how you can't post anything on your own, and must have another Weiner fan's hand to hold when posting regarding me. Does your mommy have an account too? Perhaps she can also help provide cover (and hot pockets) for you? I understand why you are not confident enough in your own words when defending something as hard to defend as Weiner. If that brings you comfort, then it is obvious that it is not enough. Do you have a bigger ping list when responding to me. Be my guest and ping other Weiner fans if you like. You need all the help you can get as you can see. Going one on one is not your "style" I guess.

Lormand responds better to insults than to informed reasoning as you can see from his subsequent posts because he works in reverse, the more informed he gets, the more 'dense' he becomes. I don't take him seriously anymore (comment from Lormand: sure, that is why you you have 20 or more posts to me just on this tread), he's good for the occasional recreational useless tit for tat banter that comes up whenever the issue of Savage comes up on FreeRepublic other than on the daily talkradio Savage thread.

I welcome insults from you and other Weiner fans, as it galvanizes everything I say about Weiner and the sychphantic clapping seals that make up much of his fan base. Since a Weiner fan must defend all of the campaign cash to California liberals, the flip-flopping of foreign policy views, the name calling of other conservative talk show hosts, the socialists view of having a minimum wage....etc, I can understand why one would resort to name calling.

Most of all, I love the Zotting and banned accounts from all the bait I throw at unhinged wackos who frequent Weiner threads. Thinking that forums are like radio shows, the Weiner fan uses the same classless tacts of Weiner and start screaming insults and unpleasantness toward those they oppose. It doesn't work against those who see right through that faux conservative Weiner.

107 posted on 07/28/2008 1:44:49 PM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
"Occasionally I run into Freepers so dense or so uninformed, it is just frustrating."

Don't worry, I never report abuse on anyone who personally attacks me. I always see this stage of Weiner fans at one point or another. Weiner sure makes it hard on you guys to defend since nothing I have ever said is untrue.

108 posted on 07/28/2008 1:54:12 PM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
Maybe we should also compile a list of Weiner fan responses?

That would make a great compliment to the list because there are no objections to any individual item and all the Weiner fan has to say is "you are a < insert personal insult here > ".

109 posted on 07/28/2008 2:00:01 PM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: lormand

An excellent idea!


110 posted on 07/28/2008 2:03:10 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
"An excellent idea!"

I'm full if it full of them. :)

This thread has already provided us with some gems.

111 posted on 07/28/2008 2:16:42 PM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: lormand

It’s like looking under a rock.


112 posted on 07/28/2008 2:28:35 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

this is good to hear why back down ...


113 posted on 07/28/2008 2:30:27 PM PDT by badgerfan1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lormand; Checkers
(comment from Lormand: sure, that is why you you have 20 or more posts to me just on this tread

Don't flatter yourself Lormand, indeed you're the only one who probably would. I post to you knowing your hatred and bias only helps weaken your position and to let others on the thread see that and I really enjoy it when I see others that do in fact see the 'truth' about you.

Engaging you and your butt-buddy Checkers in any reasoned discourse at least on the issue of Savage I have found is a total waste of time and energy as I'm sure many others who have tried also have found and are finding in this regard, of course pointing how ridiculous you always sound, well sometimes that can be fun. Oh by the way..........and don't you dare touch that dial!

"LIVE" 5-8pm


114 posted on 07/28/2008 2:37:54 PM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth
"Don't flatter yourself Lormand, indeed you're the only one who probably would. I post to you knowing your hatred and bias only helps weaken your position and to let others on the thread see that and I really enjoy it when I see others that do in fact see the 'truth' about you."

Are you some kind of parrot that knows how to type? That would explain

  1. Why you repeat everything I say
  2. Why a bird's brain would compare to yours

"Engaging you and your butt-buddy Checkers in any reasoned discourse at least on the issue of Savage I have found is a total waste of time and energy as I'm sure many others who have tried also have found and are finding in this regard, of course pointing how ridiculous you always sound, well sometimes that can be fun. Oh by the way..........and don't you dare touch that dial!"

Thanks for validating my points so eloquently. You can't argue facts, so name calling is the only resort.

Glad to see that you passed HTML 101 in your community college class.

115 posted on 07/28/2008 2:45:24 PM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Haha! You points are validated only in your own mind, nowhere else, oh and by the way, you're always welcome to drop by and say hello to the Savage gang, oops I mean the Weiner gang, right here on no other than the premier conservative forum in the nation Todays Savage thread

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!


116 posted on 07/28/2008 3:07:03 PM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth
"...I mean the Weiner gang..."

I see positive growth...


117 posted on 07/28/2008 3:22:50 PM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson