Posted on 07/24/2008 1:47:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Talk Radio Network, the syndicator of Michael Savage's "Savage Nation" radio show, issued the following statement today:
On Michael Savage's Autism Comments
There have been numerous calls in recent days for Michael Savage, who hosts The Michael Savage Show for Talk Radio Network (the Network), to be fired or suspended for his brief 84 seconds of commentary concerning autism during the July 16th broadcast of the Show.
Promptly after the Networks management learned of the comments in issue, the Network commenced an investigation into the particulars and the circumstances of those comments. This investigation began with the Networks CEO, Mark Masters, personally contacting Dr. Savage to address the concerns and obtain an explanation of the comments directly from Dr. Savage.
In that conversation, and other subsequent conversations between Mr. Masters and Dr. Savage, Dr. Savage explained the circumstances and intent of his statements in considerable detail. The Network also carefully monitored subsequent broadcasts of the Show, on Monday, July 21st and Tuesday, July 22nd, which were devoted to the subject of autism and further explanations by Dr. Savage of his views on the subject.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
You guys typify Weiner to the 'T'.
No substance, just stink.
Nit-picking spelling eh? BTW, I used bold letter, thus the use of "bold faced lier". Most people would get it.
Rabid Weiner fans think they can yell others off the thread like their messiah, Weiner does to callers on his show. Rabid Weiner fans would not know a Conservative if he were on 3 hours a day, because they confuse one that is on about 3 hours a week from San Fransisco as one.
I guess feeding two poodles is exhaustive work needing lots of time off.
It seems you are an expert on "moron". If I ever chose to be one, I'll become a Weiner fan and consult with you.
" So Savage is an individual and not a gentleman in the Republican club. Hes still a Conservative and you are still a moron."
I figured that when he campaign cash donated money to Liberals. /sarc
I guess pointing this out in your mind "proves" that I am a liberal, not Weiner? Weiner likes to try yelling people off of his show, and Weiner lovers like yourself try the same on threads. It just doesn't work for me as you should no, or will find out eventually.
Weiner will never be known for having any class, and his fans carry the same ill trail.
Only a Weiner fan or an ounce of air plane glue can conclude that Weiner critics are liberals, in spite of a smoking gun.
Then I would notice his inconsistencies in his statements. He would completely contradict himself from day to day. I soon realized that this guy has a real mental problem and an embarrassment to hard core Conservatives like myself.
Probably a good percentage of his listeners are like "rubber neckers" just staring at an accident as they go by.
Another certain percentage of his listeners are real fans who place him on an unjustified pedestal. Some of them are so consumed by their devotion to Weiner that they employ the same classless traits.
LOL! That makes it even better, you insult not because you want to, but because you have to. Lormand however is not just 'anybody', he led a failed campaign to get the Savage thread kicked off FreeRepublic, he's no different than the fascists from the Left that campaign to get Savage thrown off the air, only he's a fascist from the right. He would be dangerous if he had any real power.
Lormand responds better to insults than to informed reasoning as you can see from his subsequent posts because he works in reverse, the more informed he gets, the more 'dense' he becomes. I don't take him seriously anymore, he's good for the occasional recreational useless tit for tat banter that comes up whenever the issue of Savage comes up on FreeRepublic other than on the daily talkradio Savage thread.
I see infatuation in your comments, but I'm not flattered. The obvious thing for anyone to notice is how you can't post anything on your own, and must have another Weiner fan's hand to hold when posting regarding me. Does your mommy have an account too? Perhaps she can also help provide cover (and hot pockets) for you? I understand why you are not confident enough in your own words when defending something as hard to defend as Weiner. If that brings you comfort, then it is obvious that it is not enough. Do you have a bigger ping list when responding to me. Be my guest and ping other Weiner fans if you like. You need all the help you can get as you can see. Going one on one is not your "style" I guess.
Lormand responds better to insults than to informed reasoning as you can see from his subsequent posts because he works in reverse, the more informed he gets, the more 'dense' he becomes. I don't take him seriously anymore (comment from Lormand: sure, that is why you you have 20 or more posts to me just on this tread), he's good for the occasional recreational useless tit for tat banter that comes up whenever the issue of Savage comes up on FreeRepublic other than on the daily talkradio Savage thread.
I welcome insults from you and other Weiner fans, as it galvanizes everything I say about Weiner and the sychphantic clapping seals that make up much of his fan base. Since a Weiner fan must defend all of the campaign cash to California liberals, the flip-flopping of foreign policy views, the name calling of other conservative talk show hosts, the socialists view of having a minimum wage....etc, I can understand why one would resort to name calling.
Most of all, I love the Zotting and banned accounts from all the bait I throw at unhinged wackos who frequent Weiner threads. Thinking that forums are like radio shows, the Weiner fan uses the same classless tacts of Weiner and start screaming insults and unpleasantness toward those they oppose. It doesn't work against those who see right through that faux conservative Weiner.
Don't worry, I never report abuse on anyone who personally attacks me. I always see this stage of Weiner fans at one point or another. Weiner sure makes it hard on you guys to defend since nothing I have ever said is untrue.
That would make a great compliment to the list because there are no objections to any individual item and all the Weiner fan has to say is "you are a < insert personal insult here > ".
An excellent idea!
I'm full if it full of them. :)
This thread has already provided us with some gems.
It’s like looking under a rock.
this is good to hear why back down ...
Don't flatter yourself Lormand, indeed you're the only one who probably would. I post to you knowing your hatred and bias only helps weaken your position and to let others on the thread see that and I really enjoy it when I see others that do in fact see the 'truth' about you.
Engaging you and your butt-buddy Checkers in any reasoned discourse at least on the issue of Savage I have found is a total waste of time and energy as I'm sure many others who have tried also have found and are finding in this regard, of course pointing how ridiculous you always sound, well sometimes that can be fun. Oh by the way..........and don't you dare touch that dial!
Are you some kind of parrot that knows how to type? That would explain
"Engaging you and your butt-buddy Checkers in any reasoned discourse at least on the issue of Savage I have found is a total waste of time and energy as I'm sure many others who have tried also have found and are finding in this regard, of course pointing how ridiculous you always sound, well sometimes that can be fun. Oh by the way..........and don't you dare touch that dial!"
Thanks for validating my points so eloquently. You can't argue facts, so name calling is the only resort.
Glad to see that you passed HTML 101 in your community college class.
I see positive growth...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.