Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems pressured on guns ("NRA has 'scored' a discharge petition in determining" grades for Nov!)
The Hill ^ | 07/22/08 | Mike Soraghan

Posted on 07/24/2008 7:08:45 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2008 7:08:45 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It’s high time these “conservative” Dems from Republican districts have to put up or shut up this election season. They are “conservative” at home, and vote with Nancy Pelosi whenever she snaps her fingers.
And by the way, why don’t GOP House members bring out the Discharge Petition to force Pelosi to bring the “Drill Now” energy bill to the floor for a vote, which would also flush out those “conservative” Dems?


2 posted on 07/24/2008 7:13:08 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Why is the NRA giving cover to Democrats by telling them up front what they'll do?

Leave them free to blow off the discharge petition as a way for them to show their true colors, then nail them or praise them for the choice they make. Else they'll get the one signature and a grudge against them for the coercion.

This is really stupid on the part of the NRA.

3 posted on 07/24/2008 7:14:07 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (G-d gave us Law a fool could follow, but a genius couldn't comprehend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The NRA has to score “discharge petitions” for the first time because this congress is the most dictatorial congress in history. The leadership will not allow ANY votes they can’t control.

So they simply have not allowed any votes on gun measures. They won’t allow votes on oil drilling either.


4 posted on 07/24/2008 7:23:30 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

The NRA does not exist to elect Republicans. They exist to fight for gun rights.

They are using their “scoring” to push legislation they want to pass. That’s the whole point of scoring, not to punish people, but in the end to get them to vote how you want them to vote.


5 posted on 07/24/2008 7:24:39 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Joe Brower; El Gato; Squantos; wardaddy; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; ...
I should have caught this yesterday, but I have been busy. Here's what it's looking like, IMHO.

A Persistent Threat to Second Amendment Rights

The D.C. City Council has imposed a very burdensome system of gun registration. Only a handful of states have any registration and none has a system as complicated as that of the District. There is a solution to this tyranny. Congress can pass H.R. 1399, the "District of Columbia Personal Protection Act." The bill, which is supported by the NRA and has 247 co-sponsors, would repeal the D.C. handgun ban and the storage requirement which prohibits keeping a firearm ready for self-defense in the home, two of the provisions found to be unconstitutional in the Heller decision. Moreover, it would repeal the D.C. registration system, which is burdensome in its own right and serves as a vehicle for even more restrictions and skewed definitions. H.R. 1399 would restrict the D.C. Council's authority to impose undue restrictions upon residents' Second Amendment right. It also would repeal the ban upon semi-automatic firearms, conforming the District's law to federal legislation. It would repeal various restrictions on ammunition and the District's "Strict Liability Act," which allows manufacturers of certain types of guns "to be held strictly liable in tort, without regard to fault or proof of defect."

6 posted on 07/24/2008 7:28:18 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


7 posted on 07/24/2008 7:30:42 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
[ The National Rifle Association is putting the election-year squeeze on conservative Democrats ]

Conservative DEMOCRATS???.. Where be those critters?..
Heck its real hard to find a conservative republican these days..

This article must be talking about democrat antique gun collectors..

8 posted on 07/24/2008 7:31:55 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The NRA does not exist to elect Republicans. They exist to fight for gun rights.

Then read my post again, because that was what it was about.

9 posted on 07/24/2008 7:51:00 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (G-d gave us Law a fool could follow, but a genius couldn't comprehend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
The National Rifle Association is putting the election-year squeeze on conservative Democrats, demanding that they buck their leadership to support a bill to erase more of the District of Columbia's gun laws. Democratic gun rights supporters will risk losing their A-plus rating if they don't sign a discharge petition to be filed Wednesday bringing the gun-rights bill directly to the floor... The vote could put vulnerable Democrats, many of them freshmen elected in 2006 from conservative rural districts, in a bind. Supporters, building on their historic Supreme Court victory on gun rights in June, think they have a good chance of getting the bill to the floor because 250 House members signed an amicus curiae brief to the high court calling for repeal of the handgun ban, including 65 Democratic members. The bill, by Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), has 247 co-sponsors, including 56 Democrats.
Thanks neverdem!
10 posted on 07/24/2008 7:54:47 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

NRA Benefactor Ping


11 posted on 07/24/2008 8:12:33 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It realy steams me that after a Supreme Court decision afirming an individual right to ‘Bear Arms’; The DC gov’t wants people to dissasemble their guns IN THEIR HOMES!

Not to mention, banning semi-autos has NO basis either!

They are IGNORING the Constitution, and the SUPREME COURT!

GET THE PITCHFORKS.........


12 posted on 07/24/2008 8:45:57 AM PDT by AmericanDave (Terrorism....... it's a growth industry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The RATs will loose a lot more than just their NRA ratings if they don’t vote for drilling here and now.


13 posted on 07/24/2008 9:11:52 AM PDT by fella ("...He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

“...GET THE PITCHFORKS.........”

Pitchforks, Like hell. Get US Federal Marshalls to ENFORCE THE DAMN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW and frog march Fenty and his thugs, Nutter and his thugs, Bloomberg, and the entire New Orleans political thug machine off in manacles and orange jumpsuits.

Enough is enough.

EVERY State ratified the Constitution; they are BOUND by it. It the LAW OF THE LAND. Where is the US Justice Department?


14 posted on 07/24/2008 9:20:39 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Don’t forget it was the gunnies and not hanging chads that sank Algore.
barbra ann


15 posted on 07/24/2008 9:22:26 AM PDT by barb-tex ( A prudent man (more so for a woman) foreseeth the evil and hideth him self)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

—thanks for the ping-


16 posted on 07/24/2008 10:04:25 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But Democratic leadership aides say they’re not concerned because many of those supporters have a policy of not signing discharge petitions. They are also betting that gun issues won’t gain much traction with voters more worried about the souring economy.
Exsqueeze me but aren't we told by the Dems and Criminal Rights Groups that during times like a 'souring economy' that crime rises? (If only Tyrone, Juan, whomever, had a job as a V.P. with a nice office he wouldn't have to stick up liquor stores for baby food money)

So I'd think that 'gun issues' would gain traction in this election. It's a matter of self defense from the rising crime like muggings, armed robberies, car jacking, and home invasions that comes with a 'souring economy' .

Ergo, the worse things get (add terrorism into the mix), the more we all need firearms. And easier access to them, not draconian laws making it more difficult for law abiding citizens to even buy ammo (see CA).

17 posted on 07/24/2008 10:53:43 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Conservative DEMOCRATS???.. Where be those critters?..

Those are the "Blue Dog" Democrats. Basically, they are Democrats who ran as Conservatives. Despite that, they normally vote as San Fran Nan tells them to vote.

18 posted on 07/24/2008 12:11:30 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
[ Those are the "Blue Dog" Democrats. ]

Since most democrats are women does that make Blue Dog democrats, "bitches"?..

19 posted on 07/24/2008 12:26:04 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
'Bout time the NRA found it's collective gonads.

Actually I thought it did better in that regard when Tanya Metaska was head of the Institute for Legislative Action. But perhaps after the victory at the Supreme Court, in case that the NRA had nothing to do with bringing (although they did file amicus briefs in both the DC Circuit and the Supreme Court, good ones too).

I love it when things begin to snowball *for* our side for a change.

20 posted on 07/24/2008 2:53:41 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson