Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon

ON the other hand, there are some of us who rode in the 60s who are doing their homework and have conncluded that we don’t want a car engine on a bike frame.

I’m looking for a bike but I am doing the homework.


13 posted on 07/22/2008 9:58:53 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexanToTheCore

Honda still sells the Nighthawk 750 - pretty much the same thing they sold in 1969, with a number of updates. No car engine.

Of course, it’s significantly detuned compared to the parent bike, my 86 Nighthawk 700S. Redline 10,750, shaft drive, ungodly accel above 7K. Still keeps up with most 600-class sport bikes 0-60.


17 posted on 07/22/2008 10:12:02 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: TexanToTheCore

I’m looking forward to a motorcycle engine on a small tubular steel car frame. It should go fast, corner, stop quick and carry groceries, tools, whatever. 2+2 seating and licensed for the road would make it FUN AND economical.

Something like a sand buggy, legal for the streets will do just fine. I don’t want no “crumple zone”. I want a frame around my bod.

If they want to cut back on gas use. This will do it. Instead of widening freeways and roads, they could narrow the lanes on existing ones.


22 posted on 07/22/2008 10:19:31 AM PDT by wizr ("Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition." - Chaplain Maguire, Pearl Harbor, 1941)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson