American physicists warned not to debate global warming

The Register ^ | 21 July 2008 | Andrew Orlowski

[xcamel]

FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video

Not Evil Just Wrong (mash here)

---

Again...Go Figure...

[weegee]

“A chill wind” blows in the man made global climate change movement.

[BufordP]

A story posted just one hour ago at The Register doesn't rate "Breaking News"?

http://news.google.com/news?q=Monckton&ie=UTF-8&scoring=n

[bmwcyle]

SILENCE, I KILL YOU!!!

[isrul]

The doges have spoken.

[headsonpikes]

I advocate the revival of public horse-whipping for those ‘scientists’ parroting the political line of their financing patrons, whether Gubmint or NGO.

While no one seriously expects much better of the politicians and place-holders, these ‘scientists’ have betrayed the public trust in a profound manner, and deserve condign treatment.

[LiteKeeper]

read later

[HwyChile]

I put very little credibility in any science predictions or findings (past or present). History has shown that science has been wrong more than it has been correct with such predictions. Furthermore, it is hard to believe anything science predicts when the organizations like the one cited in this article are corrupt and scientists are not stepping forward to stop or correct the corruption.

[polymuser]

Inquisitions!

[Free Vulcan]

Looks like APS stomped on the flaming bag.

[Democrat_media]

This is Stalinist restriction of free speech.

The Marxist Democrats and the liberal mainstream Marxist media have been lying through their teeth. There is no global warming because the world is cooling rapidly proof: http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/06/the-sunspot-mys.html . That’s why the evil plotting media has been changing “global warming” to “climate change”.

Climate scientists: it’s time to move on and recognize that humans are a small, very small, factor in climate change, and since the planet is cooling, it’s crazy to worry about putting CO2 into the air because it might warm things up.

“They have observed a longer-than-normal period of solar inactivity. In the past, they observed that the sun once went 50 years without producing sunspots. That period coincided with a little ice age on Earth that lasted from 1650 to 1700. Coincidence? Some scientists say it was, but many worry that it wasn’t.

Geophysicist Phil Chapman, the first Australian to become an astronaut with NASA, said pictures from the US Solar and Heliospheric Observatory also show that there are currently no spots on the sun. He also noted that the world cooled quickly between January last year and January this year, by about 0.7C.

“This is the fastest temperature change in the instrumental record, and it puts us back to where we were in 1930,” Dr Chapman noted in The Australian recently.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/06/the-sunspot-mys.html

[ZeitgeistSurfer]

Expect a visit shortly from the Obama Jugend greenshirts and a trip to the hope/change reeducation camp.

[upier]

SILENCE, I KILL YOU!!!

LMAO! I loved that bit, Achmed (spelled A, c, phlem) the Dead Terrorist.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

When the global warming hoax is finally exposed, Algore will still have his millions and university scientists will have already spent their taxpayer supported grant money. The only question is what will their next hoax be to transfer wealth and limit individual freedoms.

[TigersEye]

Who cares about CO2? It's good for plants. Make more CO2.

The primary evidence that CO2 and the greenhouse effect have anything to do with raising global temperature is missing entirely. It isn't there.

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

This is a short and easily understandable article showing the plain truth. The hinge pin that links global temperature to the greenhouse effect is missing. It is easily measurable and hundreds of probes have done so.

[Cyclone59]

Anyone check the ‘hole’ in the ozone layer? It’s almost gone.

I have often wondered about that myself - that used to be the headline story. Has anyone observed how they now call it “climate change” opposed to warming. Makes for use both ways and since when is the weather ever been or will be static?

[Lady Jag]

The only question is what will their next hoax be to transfer wealth and limit individual freedoms.

Already been happening. Long time.

[headsonpikes]

“Inquisitions!”

Comfy Chairs!

[TigersEye]

To argue otherwise, one must prove a physical mechanism that gives a reasonable alternative cause of warming.

That sounds like a legal debate but it sure as heck isn't science. There is no need to prove any cause of warming, which is dubious now anyway, when you can simply show that the primary evidence for warming by a greenhouse effect doesn't exist. See post #35.

[Lady Jag]

CHILDREN OF THE CORN