Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edzo4

I think NYT’s view is that McCain should talked more about his plan rather than using the editorial to simply attack Obama


4 posted on 07/21/2008 9:10:49 AM PDT by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neutrality
I think NYT’s view is that McCain should talked more about his plan rather than using the editorial to simply attack Obama

Sounded like he attacked Obama's position, not Obama. How else do you debate?

10 posted on 07/21/2008 9:14:28 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality
The NYT's view is they don't like McCain's world view.

Period.

15 posted on 07/21/2008 9:16:16 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality
I think NYT’s view is that McCain should talked more about his plan

no the NYT's view is that surrender is a plan, winning is not

17 posted on 07/21/2008 9:17:10 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality

The NY Times view is a lie. Please don’t tell me you believe it.


27 posted on 07/21/2008 9:22:29 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality

their rejection is based upon the fact that most of the editorial’s content is a criticism of Obama rather than talking about what he would do.

I would like to take this as an opp to rip the NYT, but it sounds like a revised piece focused more on his plans as opposed to just a rebuttal would be accepted.


91 posted on 07/21/2008 10:07:28 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality

Ahh so candidates need to seek NYTs approval before having an opinion?

This is about the bias of NYT and nothing else.


128 posted on 07/21/2008 11:09:37 AM PDT by driftdiver (No More Obama - The corruption hasnÂ’t changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality
If that was true the editor needed to be more specific. The man worked for the Clinton administration and he is stepping in political quicksand. If he can't be more specific in his language by not clarifying what he means by 'mirroring' he does not deserve anything less then literal interpretation of his comment.

He is at fault then for not communicating clearly his directive as an editor and with such a hot political potato and he having a previous career with the Clinton administration, he is an idiot if he meant otherwise. I think at best he was purposely ambiguous and at worse he said exactly what he means. Truth be told either way he is a horrible editor of others' content-- look at where it got him and the paper.

McCain's content will be out there for even more to see now and the NYT gets yet another stain. The man is a louse.

132 posted on 07/21/2008 11:14:47 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality

Obama used his editorial to attack McCain and Bush.


152 posted on 07/21/2008 11:44:27 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality

Interesting, You dont dance to Hussain’s tune, you dont get what you want.


183 posted on 07/21/2008 12:34:20 PM PDT by Chickensoup ('08 VOTING, NOT for the GOP, but INSTEAD, for the SUPREME COURT that will be BEST for my FAMILY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality; rwfromkansas

Which candidate do either of you support for president at this point in time?


187 posted on 07/21/2008 12:42:47 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: neutrality

You “think that NYT’s view is....”

Well but sensible people don’t care about NYT’s view and want a fair campaign where the candidates can criticize each other and specifically WHERE McCAIN CAN CRITICIZE OUSbama EVEN IF the liberal “””BIBLE”””,the NYT,don’t like it.

Defeating ouBSAMA in November would be a great defeat for the MSM.They deserve it


241 posted on 07/22/2008 12:38:14 AM PDT by Ulysse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson