Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edzo4
My first inclination was to think the New York Times blew it.  Then I looked at what was written here, and I have another opinion now.

In McCain's submission to the TIMES, he writes of Obama: 'I am dismayed that he never talks about winning the war—only of ending it... if we don't win the war, our enemies will. A triumph for the terrorists would be a disaster for us. That is something I will not allow to happen as president.'

NYT's Shipley advised McCain to try again: 'I'd be pleased, though, to look at another draft.'While I agree with McCain's thoughts on Obama, this wasn't an exercise to critique your opponent.  It was a time to lay out your own plan.

If the Obama article had some personal remarks about McCain in it, the NYT would be open to some pointed criticism for playing by two sets of rules.  I'm not sure that was the case though..
.
.
.

You've taken the plunge.  How about helping to keep the facility open.
Let's get this quarter's FReapathon behind us!

155 posted on 07/21/2008 11:49:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Annapolis, flight school, Congress, Senate, MIAs, Keating 5, Soros, Kerry... tried & found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
well here are some quotes from obamas op ed

Unlike Senator John McCain, I opposed the war in Iraq before it began, and would end it as president. I believed it was a grave mistake to allow ourselves to be distracted from the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban by invading a country that posed no imminent threat and had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. Since then, more than 4,000 Americans have died and we have spent nearly $1 trillion. Our military is overstretched. Nearly every threat we face — from Afghanistan to Al Qaeda to Iran — has grown.

Instead of seizing the moment and encouraging Iraqis to step up, the Bush administration and Senator McCain are refusing to embrace this transition — despite their previous commitments to respect the will of Iraq’s sovereign government. They call any timetable for the removal of American troops “surrender,” even though we would be turning Iraq over to a sovereign Iraqi government.

Unlike Senator McCain, I would make it absolutely clear that we seek no presence in Iraq similar to our permanent bases in South Korea, and would redeploy our troops out of Iraq and focus on the broader security challenges that we face. But for far too long, those responsible for the greatest strategic blunder in the recent history of American foreign policy have ignored useful debate in favor of making false charges about flip-flops and surrender.

161 posted on 07/21/2008 11:56:40 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson