NYT's Shipley advised McCain to try again: 'I'd be pleased, though, to look at another draft.'While I agree with McCain's thoughts on Obama, this wasn't an exercise to critique your opponent. It was a time to lay out your own plan.
If the Obama article had some personal remarks about McCain in it, the NYT would be open to some pointed criticism for playing by two sets of rules. I'm not sure that was the case though..
.
.
.
Unlike Senator John McCain, I opposed the war in Iraq before it began, and would end it as president. I believed it was a grave mistake to allow ourselves to be distracted from the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban by invading a country that posed no imminent threat and had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. Since then, more than 4,000 Americans have died and we have spent nearly $1 trillion. Our military is overstretched. Nearly every threat we face from Afghanistan to Al Qaeda to Iran has grown.
Instead of seizing the moment and encouraging Iraqis to step up, the Bush administration and Senator McCain are refusing to embrace this transition despite their previous commitments to respect the will of Iraqs sovereign government. They call any timetable for the removal of American troops surrender, even though we would be turning Iraq over to a sovereign Iraqi government.
Unlike Senator McCain, I would make it absolutely clear that we seek no presence in Iraq similar to our permanent bases in South Korea, and would redeploy our troops out of Iraq and focus on the broader security challenges that we face. But for far too long, those responsible for the greatest strategic blunder in the recent history of American foreign policy have ignored useful debate in favor of making false charges about flip-flops and surrender.