[Soliton]

Dawkins’ response to flew in his own words.

http://exchristian.net/exchristian/2007/11/richard-dawkins-and-lee-strobel-antony.html

Summary: Flew is senile, he fell for the Discovery institutes nonsense, and he tells provable lies to advance his new cause.

[aruanan]

Summary: Flew is senile, he fell for the Discovery institutes nonsense, and he tells provable lies to advance his new cause.

Characterization of the above: argumentum ad hominem abusive and manifestly untrue but typical of someone like Dawkins.

[maryz]

I listened to the You Tube thing. Dawkins here is apparently preaching to the converted (if you'll excuse the expression in this context). He makes no arguments, offers no refutation, presents no analysis; his audience apparently doesn't need or want such -- but people who don't agree with his views do!