Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustaDumbBlonde
So, voting for a candidate because he sucks slightly less than another candidate is the ‘mature’ thing to do?

McCain may suck, but Obama "sucks" much more.

BTW, I’m not planning on voting for Obama, so who does that count for? I have to ask because I didn’t get the Happy Meal with the election vote counter decoder ring like the McCainiacs.

What the heck are you talking about?

103 posted on 07/19/2008 8:16:49 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

“McCain may suck, but Obama “sucks” much more.”

Change the word “much” to the word “slightly” and you might have something.


107 posted on 07/19/2008 8:22:27 PM PDT by Grunthor (I see you are playing stupid again. Looks like you're winning too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign
McCain may suck, but Obama "sucks" much more.

You GOP Kool-Aid drinkers have got to get a new play. You've been using the same one since 1988, when Poppy Bush first ran against Michael Dukakis: "Sure our candidate, {Fill in name of GOP candidate} is a smelly pile of cat vomit, but his democrat opponent, {Fill in name of Democrat candidate) is a bigger, smellier pile of cat vomit." It's just not working any more. Was it too much to ask that in the two decades since 1988 you could have found a candidate you could speak well of?

I went along with the GOP party play for 20 years. But, asking me to vote for MacCain is a line this conservative will NOT cross.

259 posted on 07/20/2008 9:43:08 AM PDT by E. Cartman (Just say "No" to mug-whores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson