Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So Popular and So Spineless [looking into world with weaker America]
nytimes.com ^ | July 16, 2008 | THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Posted on 07/16/2008 7:30:16 AM PDT by Tolik

Agreeing with THOMAS FRIEDMAN:

...<excerpt> ...

... But when it comes to pure, rancid moral corruption, no one can top South Africa’s president, Thabo Mbeki, and his stooge at the U.N., Dumisani Kumalo. They have done everything they can to prevent any meaningful U.N. pressure on the Mugabe dictatorship.

As The Times reported, America’s U.N. ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, “accused South Africa of protecting the ‘horrible regime in Zimbabwe,’ ” calling this particularly disturbing given that it was precisely international economic sanctions that brought down South Africa’s apartheid government, which had long oppressed that country’s blacks.

So let us now coin the Mbeki Rule: When whites persecute blacks, no amount of U.N. sanctions is too much. And when blacks persecute blacks, any amount of U.N. sanctions is too much.

Which brings me back to America. Perfect we are not, but America still has some moral backbone. There are travesties we will not tolerate. The U.N. vote on Zimbabwe demonstrates that this is not true for these “popular” countries — called Russia or China or South Africa — that have no problem siding with a man who is pulverizing his own people.

So, yes, we’re not so popular in Europe and Asia anymore. I guess they would prefer a world in which America was weaker, where leaders with the values of Vladimir Putin and Thabo Mbeki had a greater say, and where the desperate voices for change in Zimbabwe would, well, just shut up.


(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; mugabe; russia; southafrica; thomasfriedman; thomaslfriedman; un; zimbabwe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2008 7:30:17 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; neverdem; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; Valin; King Prout; SJackson; dennisw; ...
Agreeing with THOMAS FRIEDMAN:

... Perfect we are not, but America still has some moral backbone. There are travesties we will not tolerate. The U.N. vote on Zimbabwe demonstrates that this is not true for these “popular” countries — called Russia or China or South Africa — that have no problem siding with a man who is pulverizing his own people.

So, yes, we’re not so popular in Europe and Asia anymore. I guess they would prefer a world in which America was weaker, where leaders with the values of Vladimir Putin and Thabo Mbeki had a greater say, and where the desperate voices for change in Zimbabwe would, well, just shut up.


Nailed It!

This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for the perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author all 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of the good stuff that is worthy of attention. You can see the list of articles I pinged to lately  on  my page.
You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about). Besides this one, I keep 2 separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson and Orson Scott Card.  

2 posted on 07/16/2008 7:32:48 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

“So Popular and So Spineless...”

I thought this was going to be an article about Barack Obama. Or Democrats in general.


3 posted on 07/16/2008 7:34:43 AM PDT by WayneS (America's Commies Love Their Obami !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

I wish to offer my most sincere apology to EVERYONE who is reading this thread.

I am sorry that I capitalized the word “democrat” in my previous post.

I hope you can forgive me.


4 posted on 07/16/2008 7:37:22 AM PDT by WayneS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

It is, in a way. Obama and Democrats would prefer a more “humble” America, i.e. weaker America. The are “decrying the decline in American popularity around the world under President Bush”. They want to be “popular”. Here is a good analyzes of how to earn the popularity.


5 posted on 07/16/2008 7:39:42 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Oh, I see you are back from a re-education camp? LOL


6 posted on 07/16/2008 7:41:21 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

I haven’t heard much from the Messiah about Zimbabwe, or Sudan for that matter. He wants us to believe if he is elected he can talk to Mugabe and the President of Sudan and things will be fine. Spineless will be the best one word description for Obama.


7 posted on 07/16/2008 7:42:13 AM PDT by milwguy (........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

He speaks with his “vote” in the Senate.

Something like 70% of the pieces of legislation he has sponsored or co-sponsored in the Senate have had to do with sending U.S. taxpayer dollars to tin-pot dictatorships in Africa.


8 posted on 07/16/2008 7:44:30 AM PDT by WayneS (And now I shall return to my hovel and cling to my guns ... until it is time to go to Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

I wll not go to the NYTimes to read this lttle POS Friedman. Did he ever mention Iraq and Afganistan as examples of US Morality...if not it is just more of TM’s grandstanding BS!


9 posted on 07/16/2008 7:45:11 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

Friedman and Krugman are so consistently wrong due to their lack of economic knowledge and their lack of morals. Neither one of them knows the difference between right and wrong. They are both over-educated, nonintellectual nitwits posing as some of the great thinkers of our time. Nobody with common sense pays attention to these light-in-the-loafer elites, nor would they enjoy sitting down and having a beer with these odd “fellows.”

I think their clothes should be checked to see if they have the same DNA protein stains on them that were on Monica’s blue dress. Seriously. They are not economists - they are Bill Clinton’s concubines.


10 posted on 07/16/2008 7:51:46 AM PDT by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

I am in uncomfortable position of defending Tom Friedman. It is a good article. There is one sentence there (14 words) where I disagree, in the whole article of 814 words. (Thanks to MS Word for the word count tool).

Make an exception and go read the article. Its short. No, he is not discussing everything, but is very precise in condemning unprincipled behaviour of Russia and China, and he is NOT welcoming the world of weaker America.


11 posted on 07/16/2008 7:57:57 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

Any mention of Russia and China refusing to sign onto the sanctions introduced by the USA?


12 posted on 07/16/2008 8:10:07 AM PDT by Carley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley
YES, Russia and China refused to sign onto the sanctions introduced by the USA (quite limited sanctions, I'd say). Quote form the article:  "The U.S. put forward a simple Security Council resolution, calling for an arms embargo on Zimbabwe, the appointment of a U.N. mediator, plus travel and financial restrictions on the dictator Mugabe and 13 top military and government officials for stealing the Zimbabwe election and essentially mugging an entire country in broad daylight.

...Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s U.N. ambassador, argued that the targeted sanctions that the U.S. and others wanted to impose on Mugabe’s clique exceeded the Security Council’s mandate. “We believe such practices to be illegitimate and dangerous,” he said, describing the resolution as one more obvious “attempt to take the Council beyond its charter prerogatives.” Veto!

Mugabe’s campaign of murder and intimidation didn’t strike Churkin as “illegitimate and dangerous” — only the U.N. resolution to bring a halt to it was “illegitimate and dangerous.” Shameful. "


13 posted on 07/16/2008 8:21:24 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

thanks for the tip on TF / NYTimes art. Maybe I should give him the benefit of the doubt...


14 posted on 07/16/2008 8:28:46 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tolik; iopscusa
I am in uncomfortable position of defending Tom Friedman. It is a good article.

The "Broken Clock Rule" is clearly in play. Little Tommy stumbles upon something so obvious that even he can't ignore it.

Apartheid was not a good system but the "cure" seems to be worse than the disease.

15 posted on 07/16/2008 8:29:30 AM PDT by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clive

ping


16 posted on 07/16/2008 8:33:26 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

“Maybe I should give him the benefit of the doubt...”

This time, yes, but careful! I had to deconstruct his articles as a volunteer service to my liberal friends oh too many times. Still, I prefer to keep my eyes open - this IS a good article.


17 posted on 07/16/2008 8:38:40 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolik
He may citicize the Russians and the Chinese, but what does he propose to do about it? Friedman decries the use of force in Iraq and argues against it in Iran. Like the haloed one and his acolytes, Albright, Christopher, and Perry, Friedman is a believer in soft power, using diplomacy and like minded allies to persuade the bad guys. Funny how soft power doesn't have any effect when the bad guys have big and powerful friends who do not pass up the opportunity to humble the US.

I am sure Friedman does not advocate the unilateral use of force in Zimbabwe. I am sure he rejects McCain's plan for a League of Committed democracies. For all the do gooder words in today's column Friedman would be enraged if a Marine MEU suddenly appeared in Zimbabwe or Darfur to put an end to the terror.

18 posted on 07/16/2008 8:58:20 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

Thomas J. Friedman and me on the same page, WTF? Has the world begun to spin out?

Thanks for the ping.


19 posted on 07/16/2008 9:11:49 AM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Don’t let it happen again.


20 posted on 07/16/2008 9:39:46 AM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson