Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Anaconda" Could Provide up to 20 MW of Wave Energy
Renewable Energy World ^ | 7/15/2008

Posted on 07/15/2008 6:30:57 AM PDT by Uncledave

"Anaconda" Could Provide up to 20 MW of Wave Energy Swindon, UK [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

A device consisting of a giant rubber tube may hold the key to producing affordable electricity from the energy in sea waves. Invented in the UK, the "Anaconda" is a new wave-energy concept. Researchers working on the device say its simple design means it would be cheap to manufacture and maintain, possibly enabling it to produce clean electricity at lower cost than other types of wave energy converter. Cost has been a key barrier to deployment of such converters to date.

Named after the snake of the same name because of its long thin shape, the Anaconda is closed at both ends and filled completely with water. It is designed to be anchored just below the sea's surface, with one end facing the oncoming waves.

A wave hitting the end squeezes it and causes a "bulge wave" to form inside the tube. (A bulge wave is a wave of pressure produced when a fluid oscillates forwards and backwards inside a tube.) As the bulge wave runs through the tube, the initial sea wave that caused it runs along the outside of the tube at the same speed, squeezing the tube more and more and causing the bulge wave to get bigger and bigger. The bulge wave then turns a turbine fitted at the far end of the device and the power produced is fed to shore via a cable.

Because it is made of rubber, the Anaconda is much lighter than other wave energy devices (which are primarily made of metal) and dispenses with the need for hydraulic rams, hinges and articulated joints. This reduces capital and maintenance costs and scope for breakdowns.

The Anaconda is, however, still at an early stage of development. The concept has only been proven at very small laboratory-scale, so important questions about its potential performance still need to be answered. Funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), and in collaboration with the Anaconda's inventors and with its developer, Checkmate SeaEnergy, engineers at the University of Southampton are now embarking on a program of larger-scale laboratory experiments and novel mathematical studies designed to do just that.Computer simulation of how the Anaconda would look at sea.

Using tubes with diameters of 0.25 and 0.5 meters [approx. 10 to 20 inches], the experiments will assess the Anaconda's behavior in regular, irregular and extreme waves. Parameters measured will include internal pressures, changes in tube shape and the forces that mooring cables would be subjected to. As well as providing insights into the device's hydrodynamic behavior, the data will form the basis of a mathematical model that can estimate exactly how much power a full-scale Anaconda would produce.

When built, each full-scale Anaconda device would be 200 meters [656 feet] long and 7 meters [23 feet] in diameter, and deployed in water depths of between 40 and 100 meters [131 to 328 feet]. Initial assessments indicate that the Anaconda would be rated at a power output of 1 megawatt (MW) and might be able to generate power at a cost of UK 6p [US $0.12] per kilowatt-hour (kWh) or less. Although around twice as much as the cost of electricity generated from traditional coal-fired power stations, this compares very favorably with generation costs for other leading wave energy concepts.

Together with tidal energy, it is estimated that wave power could supply up to 20% of the UK's current electricity demand.

"The Anaconda could make a valuable contribution to environmental protection by encouraging the use of wave power," says Professor John Chaplin, who is leading the EPSRC-funded project. "A one-third scale model of the Anaconda could be built next year for sea testing and we could see the first full-size device deployed off the UK coast in around five years' time."

To see a video animation of the anaconda, click here, and select: Anaconda Movie Clip Windows Media or Apple Quicktime.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; waveenergy; wavepower
For the wacky "on the drawing board" files.
1 posted on 07/15/2008 6:30:57 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ...
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

2 posted on 07/15/2008 6:31:30 AM PDT by Uncledave (Zombie Reagan '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

I can’t see this concept squeezing much power at full scale, though I’m not an engineer. But I do like the potential for ocean energy - there’s a heck of a lot of ocean and tides, waves and currents and there’s working concepts at megawatt scale that float and bob. Salt water is murder on equipment though.


3 posted on 07/15/2008 6:34:45 AM PDT by Uncledave (Zombie Reagan '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

The “shore people” don’t want to have us drill over the horizon out of site but will put junk all over the beach to get free power.

If we can’t use their oil they shouldn’t be able to use ours.


4 posted on 07/15/2008 6:38:46 AM PDT by mountainlion (Concerned Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

***Initial assessments indicate that the Anaconda would be rated at a power output of 1 megawatt (MW) and might be able to generate power at a cost of UK 6p [US $0.12] per kilowatt-hour (kWh) or less. Although around twice as much as the cost of electricity generated from traditional coal-fired power stations, this compares very favorably with generation costs for other leading wave energy concepts.***

Why bother if it’s that much more expensive?


5 posted on 07/15/2008 6:38:59 AM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

The eco-twits will never allow it.

They will say that whales will try to mate with it and go extint, or it will harm the spotted farting seal or some such thing.


6 posted on 07/15/2008 6:54:16 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
The “shore people” don’t want to have us drill over the horizon out of site but will put junk all over the beach to get free power.

They don't mind putting it on YOUR beach, but nothing goes on Cape Cod (f'r instance.)

7 posted on 07/15/2008 6:54:47 AM PDT by thulldud (Congress does not want answers. They want scapegoats. (andy58-in-nh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
ANACONDA
8 posted on 07/15/2008 7:16:33 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, youÂ’ve got it made." Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

My Anaconda don’t want none
Unless you’ve got WAVES, hon!


9 posted on 07/15/2008 7:18:39 AM PDT by Constitution Day (This tagline is a Designated Whine-Free Zone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Why bother if it’s that much more expensive?

Because “alternative” like “organic” spells M O N E Y.

Who knows what will be discovered in the next 25 years while
we are burning coal, gas, and various crude oil fractions.


10 posted on 07/15/2008 7:50:55 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
Why bother if it’s that much more expensive?

That is probably less expensive than other alternative energy sources and, unlike fossil fuels, won't run out. I think it is a clever concept and hope it succeeds. I just wonder what the life expectancy of a rubber tube exposed to sun and salt water is?

11 posted on 07/15/2008 8:18:48 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wita

YUP,

wind energy is subsidized up the ying-yang YET
the USA sits on top of 2 Trillion barrels of shale oil that is profitable to recover at 50 bucks a barrel.

There is no energy shortage.


12 posted on 07/15/2008 9:18:27 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

What would be the power out of an ordinary municipal power plant?


13 posted on 07/15/2008 9:21:58 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
That is probably less expensive than other alternative energy sources and, unlike fossil fuels, won't run out.Except when the seas are becalmed. Also a really good storm or squall would rip these from their moorings and do all sorts of things to them. The sea can be very fickle.
14 posted on 07/15/2008 9:28:21 AM PDT by fella ("...He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson