Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncledave

***Initial assessments indicate that the Anaconda would be rated at a power output of 1 megawatt (MW) and might be able to generate power at a cost of UK 6p [US $0.12] per kilowatt-hour (kWh) or less. Although around twice as much as the cost of electricity generated from traditional coal-fired power stations, this compares very favorably with generation costs for other leading wave energy concepts.***

Why bother if it’s that much more expensive?


5 posted on 07/15/2008 6:38:59 AM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastedyears

Why bother if it’s that much more expensive?

Because “alternative” like “organic” spells M O N E Y.

Who knows what will be discovered in the next 25 years while
we are burning coal, gas, and various crude oil fractions.


10 posted on 07/15/2008 7:50:55 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: wastedyears
Why bother if it’s that much more expensive?

That is probably less expensive than other alternative energy sources and, unlike fossil fuels, won't run out. I think it is a clever concept and hope it succeeds. I just wonder what the life expectancy of a rubber tube exposed to sun and salt water is?

11 posted on 07/15/2008 8:18:48 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson