Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RJC: Obama Should Disinvite Hagel from Israel Trip
RJC ^ | July 14, 2008

Posted on 07/14/2008 11:51:53 AM PDT by SJackson

RJC: Obama Should Disinvite Hagel from Israel Trip

Contact: Press Secretary Suzanne Kurtz Monday, July 14, 2008

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(July 14, 2008) -- Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks issued the followed statement today calling on Sen. Barack Obama to drop Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) from his upcoming trip to Israel:

"If Barack Obama is getting advice from Chuck Hagel about Israel, then the American Jewish community has a lot to worry about. Of all the senators with whom Obama could have traveled with, Hagel's record on Israel is one of the worst. Senator Obama should disinvite Senator Hagel from this trip," said Brooks. "The message to the Jewish community is heard loud and clear. Where Barack Obama has chosen to visit Israel with one of the most anti-Israel senators, by contrast, on John McCain's most recent trip to Israel, he chose to visit with Joseph Lieberman."

The National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), cited clear examples of Sen. Hagel's abysimal record on Israel.

In August 2006, Hagel was one of only 12 senators who refused to write the EU asking them to declare Hezbollah a terrorist organization.

In December 2005, Hagel was one of only 27 who refused to sign a letter to President Bush to pressure the Palestinian Authority to ban terrorist groups from participating in Palestinian legislative elections. In June 2004, Hagel refused to sign a letter urging President Bush to highlight Iran's nuclear program at the G-8 summit.

In November 2001, Hagel was one of only 11 senators who refused to sign a letter urging President Bush not to meet with the late Yassir Arafat until his forces ended the violence against Israel.

In October 2000, Hagel was one of only four senators who refused to sign a Senate letter in support of Israel. "Barack Obama continues to send every wrong signal to the Jewish community about who he is and where he stands on issues important to Israel. Since the RJC and the NJDC share similar concerns about Senator Hagel, we hope they will join us in calling on Obama to drop Hagel from the upcoming trip," said Brooks.


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; hagel; obama; obamatrip; rjc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2008 11:51:53 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If anyone seriously believes Obama will be a friend to Israel, they are sadly mistaken. He didn’t choose Hagel by pure coincidence.


2 posted on 07/14/2008 11:54:39 AM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Photobucket
3 posted on 07/14/2008 11:55:12 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From the National Jewish Democratic Council blog

March 12, 2007

Indecisive Senator Hagel has Questionable Israel Record

As Senator Hagel sits around for six more months and tries to decide whether to launch a futile bid for the White House, he has a lot of questions to answer about his commitment to Israel.  Consider this:

- In August 2006, Hagel was one of only 12 Senators who refused to write the EU asking them to declare Hezbollah a terrorist organization.

- In October 2000, Hagel was one of only 4 Senators who refused to sign a Senate letter in support of Israel.

- In November 2001, Hagel was one of only 11 Senators who refsued to sign a letter urging President Bush not to meet with the late Yassir Arafat until his forces ended the violence against Israel.

- In December 2005, Hagel  was one of only 27 who refused to sign a letter to President Bush to pressure the Palestinian Authroity to ban terrorist groups from participating in Palestinian legislative elections. 

- In June 2004, Hagel refused to sign a letter urging President Bush to highlight Iran's nuclear program at the G-8 summit.

Here's what the National Review wrote about Hagel's stance on Israel in 2002:

"There's nothing Hagel         likes less than talking about right and wrong in the context of foreign         policy. Pro-Israeli groups view him almost uniformly as a problem. "He         doesn't always cast bad votes, but he always says the wrong thing,"         comments an Israel supporter who watches Congress. An April speech is         a case in point. "We will need a wider lens to grasp the complex         nature and consequences of terrorism," said Hagel. He went on to         cite a few examples of terrorism: FARC in Colombia, Abu Sayyaf in the         Philippines, and the Palestinian suicide bombers. Then he continued, "Arabs         and Palestinians view the civilian casualties resulting from Israeli military         occupation as terrorism." He didn't exactly say he shares this view         — but he also failed to reject it." 

And here's what the anti-Israel group, CAIR wrote in praise of Hagel:

“Potential presidential candidates for 2008, like Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Joe Biden and Newt Gingrich, were falling all over themselves to express their support for Israel. The only exception to that rule was Senator Chuck Hagel …” [Council on American-Islamic Relations, 8/28

 


4 posted on 07/14/2008 11:56:58 AM PDT by SJackson (I was introduced to dog meat (tough), snake meat (touPgher), roasted grasshopper (crunchy), BH Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Chuck hagel...RINO and all around traitor. Another of the prime reasons the republican party is in trouble this fall.


5 posted on 07/14/2008 12:08:01 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT

..................

Obama to visit Israel and West Bank next week

6 posted on 07/14/2008 12:11:00 PM PDT by SJackson (I was introduced to dog meat (tough), snake meat (touPgher), roasted grasshopper (crunchy), BH Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Nice pick for a travelling companion there Barry.
Why don’t you put Weasely Clark on TV again to tell us that he has faith in your “judgment?”

I hope you show up with that @#$%^ Hagel in tow and Olmert shuts the door in your face.


7 posted on 07/14/2008 12:31:59 PM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
As a card carrying member of RJC and AIPAC. I herby nominate Chuck Hagel for the next Obama person under the Bus. Obama flip flop express
8 posted on 07/14/2008 12:42:02 PM PDT by ncfool (Barack show us the birth certificate. Obama the Manchurian Candidate .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

Bi-Partisan hate that’s why Obama needs Hagel. Also gets the trip on the taxpayers as its a Senate mission.


9 posted on 07/14/2008 12:44:37 PM PDT by ncfool (Barack show us the birth certificate. Obama the Manchurian Candidate .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This is a bit strange, the RJC calling on "Osama" Obama not to go with a "Republican" (actually, RINO) senator.

Glad to know that pacifist-isolationist Hagel will be retiring soon.

10 posted on 07/14/2008 12:48:23 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

God forbid we have a Senator who doesn’t always blindly bow to the Israeli lobby. What the hell has happened to conservatism?


11 posted on 07/14/2008 1:37:13 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

“What the hell has happened to conservatism?”

Said the Libertarian.


12 posted on 07/14/2008 1:38:45 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian
God forbid we have a Senator who doesn’t always blindly bow to the Israeli lobby. What the hell has happened to conservatism?

Actually it's not the dreaded Jewish Lobby that's the main problem. It's the secret and ultra-sneaky Jewish cabal that runs the world from the basement in the Rothschild bank in London.

13 posted on 07/14/2008 2:29:32 PM PDT by Blennos (High Point, NC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

I didn’t say “Jewish Lobby”. Many Jews oppose groups like AIPAC. Those who assume all Jews think alike are the real anti-Semites.


14 posted on 07/14/2008 2:34:23 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

The fact that there’s now a difference between the two underscores my point.


15 posted on 07/14/2008 2:36:42 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

Libertarians are not conservatives. Don’t lecture us on how we should act.


16 posted on 07/14/2008 4:06:16 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

If by “us” you mean conservatives, that would include me.


17 posted on 07/14/2008 9:06:38 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

Libertarians are not conservatives


18 posted on 07/15/2008 5:06:34 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I’d consider myself both. American Heritage dictionary defines a conservative as somebody who adhere to the principles of conservatism, which is defined as:

“A political philosophy or attitude emphasizing respect for traditional institutions, distrust of government activism, and opposition to sudden change in the established order.”

A libertarian is defined as:

“One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state.”

Can you explain to me how the two are mutually exclusive? I’d say there’s likely to be quite a bit of overlap there.

I leave you with a quote from Ronald Reagan:

“If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.”

Yeah, you’re right, no relation at all.


19 posted on 07/15/2008 5:58:28 AM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Hagel was.

He is slipping further into “was” by trying to be Obama’s Liberman.

Liberman and Grahm will hold effective control of the Senate. Hagel will control nothing


20 posted on 07/15/2008 6:02:34 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson