[boogerbear]

I haven’t attempted to badger you into anything. I’ve simply asked WHY. It’s not my fault you can’t come up with a reason why inBev would shut down American production and chose to import all of the AB beverages yet insist that it is not only a possibility but a probability. Maybe if you actually answered the question I’d agree with you. But instead of answering the question you say I’m making assumptions and then say I’m dense. Talk about badgering.

[DoughtyOne]

I haven’t attempted to badger you into anything.  Three or four, and perhaps even three and four posts back, I stated that in the end you may be proven right, but I was not convinced of it.  Explain to me what more needed to be said at that point.

I’ve simply asked WHY.  I explained to you in detail the why of it.  You chose to deflect my example and state that this time all decisions would be made rationally.  You can't say that for sure, and I pointed that out.  You don't like the answer, but it's an answer.

It’s not my fault you can’t come up with a reason why inBev would shut down American production and chose to import all of the AB beverages yet insist that it is not only a possibility but a probability.  Please point me to the place where I stated any of this would take place.

Maybe if you actually answered the question I’d agree with you.  I did answer you.  You didn't like the answer.  And you dimissed by response to once again state rational decesions were guaranteed to rule the day subsequent to this acquisition.

But instead of answering the question you say I’m making assumptions and then say I’m dense. Talk about badgering.  You are assuming that the points you made are going to be the points and the only points that will be discussed during board decisions made post purchase.  You can't even be sure the points you made will be the points the board wishes to emphasize when their decisions are made in upcoming years.

Later.