I’ve tried to be nice to you. I believe I said you made some points I couldn’t refute. In the end it all boils down to what the corporation in it’s infinite wisdom decides to do.
It doesn’t hinge on what rational arguements you can make.
It doesn’t matter what rational arguements I can make.
It doesn’t matter what rational arguements uppper and middle management at Budweiser make.
It doesnt’ matter what makes sense to it’s stockholders or employees.
Rationality is no indicator of what will or will not take place.
And yes, sadly, you are making a ton of assumptions. You think you have a good reason to do it, and perhaps you do. It’s still no guarantee of future decision outcomes.
I admit that my concerns aren’t either. All I can do is tell you I have concerns here. You don’t, and I accept that.
Sorry but when you say, as you said, that’s it’s going to cost American jobs, then you need to defend that position. Which so far you haven’t even attempted to do, the best you’ve got is to say I’m making assumptions, which isn’t a defense of your position.
Defend your position or admit you’re just another doom and gloomer. WHY would they do it? Give any LOGICAL reason, not some doom and gloom “oh they might not be logical” BS, why they’d move production overseas. Rationality IS an indicator of what will or will not take place and when you say it isn’t you’re really just saying that your position is 100% emotional, and subsequently even less useful than assumption.