Had she been a man...
She has more (pant)suits for a week's worth of campaigning than I'll ever own. She barks orders. She SLAMS boilermakers. She has others prepare her food, clean her house and run her errands. And she's a dedicated Yankee fan.
Who says she isn't a man?
To: Libloather
2 posted on
07/12/2008 2:16:27 PM PDT by
Hulka
To: writer33; AT7Saluki; Liz; MurryMom
When women start a new job, they tend to feel they are "faking it"...Women don't 'fake it' - do they?
3 posted on
07/12/2008 2:18:45 PM PDT by
Libloather
(July is Liberal Awareness Month.)
To: Libloather
A Yale psychologist who worked in Clinton's officeHey honey... don't quit your day job...
4 posted on
07/12/2008 2:19:15 PM PDT by
John123
(Obambi said that he has been in 57 states. I will now light myself on fire...)
To: Libloather
Had she been a man, these outbursts of anger would have been interpreted as assertiveness, intolerance of fools, a sign of status. That would explain why the Democrats and the media (pardon the redundancy) try to paint McCane's occasional flashes of temper as proof that he's an unstable, hotheaded, mentally-off former POW who can't be trusted to stand up to the strains of the presidency. Oh, no, wait: it wouldn't.
5 posted on
07/12/2008 2:19:15 PM PDT by
HHFi
To: Libloather
The author is too stupid to realize that her article and attitude do more to set women back than anything. Ridiculous in so many ways.
6 posted on
07/12/2008 2:20:31 PM PDT by
Tigercap
(McCain. For Supreme Court judge nominations and WOT progress if nothing else.)
To: Libloather
You forgot that she also has a young woman, half her age following her around like a puppy.
7 posted on
07/12/2008 2:21:01 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: Libloather
We regard irritability in men as a sign of status. But in women, we see it as a sign of incompetence LOLed right there. I've had male bosses who got irritable; I thought they acted ... girlish.
To: Libloather
We regard irritability in men as a sign of status. But in women, we see it as a sign of incompetence Who is "we"? It's a sign of incompetence in both sexes.
10 posted on
07/12/2008 2:26:10 PM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
To: Libloather
To: Libloather
To: Libloather
“We regard irritability in men as a sign of status. But in women, we see it as a sign of incompetence”
This is nonsense. Irritability in men is childish and femalean (yes, that's a word. I invented it myself)
There is something quite pathological about certain females who aspire to have the worst traits of the worst men. Women want to be powerful by being like Stalin, Pol Pot, or Attila the Hun. They never seem to grasp that there are better ways to lead, and better role models to follow.
14 posted on
07/12/2008 2:35:22 PM PDT by
ChicagahAl
(So your bumper sticker says: "Don't blame me, I didn't vote!"? Duh!)
To: Libloather
Women lacking a sense of entitlement has never been an issue from what I have seen. Don't get me wrong, I adore women, but of all the problems/issues they face I don't for a second give that one any credence.
15 posted on
07/12/2008 2:38:26 PM PDT by
allmendream
(shamelessly stealing clever FReeper lines without attribution!)
To: Libloather
Slamming things around, banging things and yelling at others — this is not well-thought of in men. It is just out-of-control behavior with no thot of others. AKA “Throwing your weight around.” tsk tsk tsk.
16 posted on
07/12/2008 2:39:14 PM PDT by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: Libloather
Hillary is a woman? I had never heard that! Why didn’t she ever mention it during her campaign?
17 posted on
07/12/2008 2:40:26 PM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
(DNC = Do Nothing Congress)
To: Libloather
It’s because men shout, women b1tch. ‘nuff said.
19 posted on
07/12/2008 3:15:46 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Libloather
Had she been a man, these outbursts of anger would have been interpreted as assertiveness, intolerance of fools, a sign of status.
No, not really. A sign that someone's promoted above their competence, perhaps. Or is just a horses behind.
22 posted on
07/12/2008 4:03:38 PM PDT by
Lee N. Field
(You wouldn't want a postmodern to fix your car. Why would you trust him with your theology?)
To: Libloather
Just goes to show you, in the Liberal mind, Liberals don’t lose elections. Elections are stolen from them by less worthy opponents. Liberalism is a form of Narcissism.
To: Libloather
Hopefully they’ll take their anger out on Obama. Whenever possible I try to complain about the sexist treatment of Hillary to Democrats I work with. It was so sexist even a male like myself could see it. It’s my own private operation chaos.
24 posted on
07/12/2008 5:54:39 PM PDT by
Hamilcar_Barca
(If Obama is elected the U.S. Soldiers in Iraq will have died in vain.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson