Posted on 07/12/2008 8:34:49 AM PDT by Loyalist
The homosexual agenda falls back on plan B with pseudo-scientific "evidence" to suggest we're all secretly bisexual, waiting to express our homosexual urges. The agenda rolls on....
Well, if they hadn’t interfered, these gay penguins would still be sitting on a rock, and their lines would die out in due course.
In fact, their lines will probably die out anyway, since the egg they hatched evidently belonged to a pair of normal penguins.
On this matter, Darwin is in complete agreement with the Bible. Homosexuality does not help propagate the species.
(And if these gay penguins manage to teach their adopted child to be gay, then his line will die out after all.)
“Two penguins native to Antarctica met one spring day in 1998 in a tank at the Central Park Zoo in midtown Manhattan.”
Gay stuff is not unheard of in prison.....
“But no egg was forthcoming: Roy and Silo were both male.”
Wonder why they ommitted the fact that this was in a controlled environment with no females and when a female was introduced, Silo paired up with her.
Bonobos, definitely a sterling example of how mankind should carry on its interpersonal relationships.
If it’s good enough for a bunch of damned dirty apes, then buggery should be good enough for humans.
I heard this happens in "male" bathrooms, too.
Pathetic.
The agenda rolls on....
Yes indeed. I do recall many years ago on a course concerning territorial imperative and aggression. These incorporated into book titles. A gentleman with umpteen degrees and anthropological wisdom had studied monkeys of various types in a zoo. He wrote an immense work concerning their behavior. He applied this to how humans behave.
Years later a study was completed and it was found this: By the very nature of an unnatural environment,- that of caging animals up, their very conduct was certainly unlike that if they were free. The original work was thus discredited.
On the lighter side, I remember a BBC presentation about the "gallant few" - airmen who defeated the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain. Just because there were cartoon characters of a fop fighter pilot, "jolly wizzo, good show, wizzard prang" and all that. The BBC claimed the gallant few, were mostly homosexuals against the more masculine Luftwaffe.
Bloody lies of course.
Oddly, most gays don’t like bi-sexuals, because it contradicts their belief that they are born gay.
I was thinking the same thing, but you expressed it much better than I thought it. Thank you!
Mr. Freud, meet Mr. Darwin.
In other words, it’s a fine line between “Happy Feet” and “Light in the Loafers”
You owe me a keyboard.
These things happen to humans in prison as well, why not penguins? It proves nothing, other than it isn’t natural for either species.
It need not be homosexuality we are talking about - for any behavior, it is plain idiocy to obtain justification from animals (what they do or do not do). The natural vs unnatural argument is pathetic no matter how it is used.
So in other words, humans define sexuality by behavior where as animals are in way higher beings because they don't?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.