Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hoping to win on offshore drilling, GOP drops Alaska push
McClatchy Newspapers ^ | July 9, 2008 | Erika Bolstad

Posted on 07/10/2008 3:48:37 AM PDT by NCDragon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: randita
Could be, but I think they GOP leadership knows they have the votes to pass offshore drilling, but with Alaska added in, they don't have the votes. Some issues may be worth scoring political points over, but I think this one is too important to do that. I say strike while the iron is hot and get offshore passed. If, as a result of offshore, oil prices decline substantially, the GOP can then say look what a difference it made. Let's go for ANWAR as well.

Bingo. Get what you can, and then go for more. Trying to get everything at once gets you nothing.

41 posted on 07/10/2008 5:55:02 AM PDT by kevkrom ("This is not the [fill in the blank] that I knew" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

I can’t put in adequate words how disillusioned I have become with the way the system our Founding Fathers established for us has been stolen by both the major political parties.

Gee, seemed pretty concise and to the point to me. Always good to hear from the southern command. Oh if only the founders were allowed to return as a group to counsel us, but, we were not left without their words of wisdom.

Were they to return, methinks they would say no more or less than what they said in the beginning, and so it behooves us to pay close attention to what the Fathers envisioned for this nation. I agree, those we have elected as our representatives have lost sight of the Big Picture, The vision of the founders.

Try to have a “good day”

Chip Campbell


42 posted on 07/10/2008 6:49:24 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wita
I have previously stated that capacity figures for the Alyeska Pipeline are hard to find.

About 2 MMBPD. The average flow rate for 1988 was 2,033,082 BPD.

http://www.alyeska-pipe.com/Pipelinefacts/Throughput.html

It peaked at 2.1 MMBPD during 1988 and is approximately the design limitation.

http://www.alyeska-pipe.com/about.html

717,042 BPD has been the average rate this year.

http://www.alyeska-pipe.com/Default.asp

43 posted on 07/10/2008 7:07:55 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
the Alaska pipeline is running at half capacity now

Make that 1/3 capacity.

44 posted on 07/10/2008 7:08:53 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Backhoe, you forgot that B Hussein’s energy plan will involve solar panels on your roof, bicycling to work, $4/gal taxes on fuel, expensive carbon offsets, mandatory “lights-out” directives after 11 PM, astronomical electricity taxes, abolition of vehicles weighing more than 2000 lbs (without a government-aproved permit), and cleaning your clothing in the river alongside other charming natives.


45 posted on 07/10/2008 7:35:09 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks, been to the pipeline site numerous times, but somehow missed the yearly figures you posted. So initially it seems a short pipeline from ANWR to the Alyeska pipeline would do the job.


46 posted on 07/10/2008 7:53:16 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

The Dems and some Reps just want a bill for political cover before the elections, just like the October 2006 Secure Fence Act. Taking ANWR off the table just makes the political cover that much easier, especially for the Dems and our nominee, McCain.


47 posted on 07/10/2008 7:55:42 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita

Yes and the existing Badami Pipeline connects to Pump Station #1 and ends 30 miles from ANWR. It would not be big enough for peak flow rates but would be useful for early starting of some initial fields on the East Side.


48 posted on 07/10/2008 7:59:49 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

Gov Palin was involvd in a chain reaction SUV collision incident of about five SUVs. Her SUV was hit in the rear by an SUV driven by someone who has habitually not paid attention while driving. Nobody hurt.


49 posted on 07/10/2008 8:03:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita
I participated in some small parts to the Strategic Reconfiguration and the associated mainline pump and drive replacements. An engineer working for me did start-up assistance and preparatory commissioning work.

The new pumps together are designed for a maximum flow rate of 1 MMBPD but are of a modular design and the equipment and tie-ins are designed to add pump and supporting equipment to scale up to 2 MMBPD if the flow rate ever approaches more than 1 MMBPD.

I don't know where that would be documented in a publicly available online site. Much of the Strategic Reconfiguration Project has been a disaster in Project Management.

I was enrolled in a Master's Program for Project Management. The course director was looking for someone willing to gather information and do a thesis on it. But he warned it was better for someone near retirement or planning to move as it would likely be a career ending project for anyone working with any of the majors in Alaska. He was called in to consult well after people were getting fired for the mess. It makes the New Denver Airport look like a well run project.

50 posted on 07/10/2008 8:07:44 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wita
we are not getting the whole story

Sen Stevens issued a complete report on this a month ago. The whole story. All this information has been available all along.

51 posted on 07/10/2008 8:08:00 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

That’s right..go for the whole loaf..max political gain...drive a stake thru their eco-hearts.


52 posted on 07/10/2008 8:19:37 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tom h
Backhoe, you forgot that B Hussein’s energy plan will involve solar panels on your roof, bicycling to work, $4/gal taxes on fuel, expensive carbon offsets, mandatory “lights-out” directives after 11 PM, astronomical electricity taxes, abolition of vehicles weighing more than 2000 lbs (without a government-aproved permit), and cleaning your clothing in the river alongside other charming natives.

Yes, I look forward to scrapping my electric razor and plucking my whiskers out, Indian-style, with a pair of clamshells...

53 posted on 07/10/2008 9:06:16 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the Trakball in to the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Republicans just aiming to please their compadres on the "other side" of the aisle.

Humpin' to please

54 posted on 07/10/2008 12:32:22 PM PDT by Ron H. (If you don't stand for conservatism then you'll end up with socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
Republicans just aiming to please their compadres on the "other side" of the aisle.

Humpin' to please

I'm really not kidding about my post-election "plan," regardless of who comes out on top:
( "Win" doesn't really describe it well...)

Jump in the swamp
Dig a hole
Jump in the hole
Pull the hole in after me

55 posted on 07/10/2008 12:38:19 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the Trakball in to the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

As the late George Carlin said, “The word ‘bipartisan’ means that some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out.”


56 posted on 07/10/2008 12:40:11 PM PDT by dfwgator ( This tag blank until football season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randita

If they do manage to get offshore drilling passed I’m sure it will be with the provision that the states have a say regarding their shores so it’s not likely to be a complete victory. For instance, California will certainly decline and I think Florida may too, even with Crist’s sudden conversion.


57 posted on 07/10/2008 3:11:06 PM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Senate Republicans have dropped the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from their energy policy discussions, focusing instead on persuading Democrats to lift a moratorium on offshore drilling. It's a move that has angered the longtime standard-bearer for drilling in ANWR, U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, who has vowed to put the issue back in front of his colleagues in the Senate. "It's not off my table," Stevens said. "Unless you include Alaska in an energy solution, it's a non-solution."
President Obama will be happy to drill the ANWR.
58 posted on 07/11/2008 4:52:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

President Bush needs to fly up to Alaska, CARRY ALL THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS CORPS WITH HIM, then fly them all to the test well-head in ANWR.

Hold a news conference there. Ask the reporters to look around and the cameramen to pan around.

Then ask them “WHAT IS SO SACRED ABOUT THIS BARREN WILDERNESS THAT WE CAN’T DRILL FOR THE BILLIONS OF BARRELLS OF OIL HERE? CALL YOUR CONGRESSMAN TODAY AND D*E*M*A*N*D that we begin drilling. TODAY!”

That would work wondrs for the price of oil.


59 posted on 07/11/2008 5:27:38 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson