To: Arkinsaw
In general, literalism is correct, but there is no greater artist than God and "not literal" does not equal "not true". Jesus' parables were not to be taken as literal, but yet are true. Yeah, but the trick is, God more or less clues us in when something is not meant literally. A lot of people just like to take whatever conflicts with their theology as "not literal" so that they can rework it into whatever they want it to say.
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Yeah, but the trick is, God more or less clues us in when something is not meant literally. A lot of people just like to take whatever conflicts with their theology as "not literal" so that they can rework it into whatever they want it to say.
In general, if it doesn't make some logical sense its probably not literal. For instance, Jerusalem becoming the highest mountain yet rivers flow south through it. Yes, God could make rivers flow up hill, but its more likely that the highest mountain part is not really meant to be taken literally.
I really have no opinion on the tribulation theories and arguments. I don't know and am not sure it matters. Perhaps being prepared for either eventuality is the way to go.
13 posted on
07/09/2008 4:24:16 PM PDT by
Arkinsaw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson