Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cmdr straker; Yo-Yo
And how far behind is the A330MRTT.

June 2008

The first Airbus A330 had arrived in Australia for conversion to a KC-30B Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) under Project AIR 5402.

The aircraft, which is the first of four Airbus A330s to be modified in Australia, arrived at the Qantas Australian Conversion Centre at Brisbane Airport after departing the Airbus facility in Toulouse, France.

http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/news/ontarget/2008/jun08/nb2.cfm

Don't mix up first for conversion with first A330 MRTT for Australia. Australia's first tanker is already converted and flying.

Just like the KC-767 for Japan and Italy They have Flown and are delivered. which the KC-767AT is derived from.

The KC-767 for Italy have not been delivered yet. See my last post above.

Delivered late Due to Japan wanting FAA certification.

The Royal Australian Air Force's first KC-30B Multi-role Tanker/Transport is being readied for its final phase of ground and flight testing, which will clear the way for a 2009 delivery of the world's most advanced aerial tanker platform to a key U.S. ally.

The KC-30B successfully completed Phase I flight testing in just three months earlier this year. During Phase I, the MRTT flight envelope was explored and expanded, aerodynamic and performance data gathered, and aircraft handling qualities validated with the full-up aerial refueling boom and wing pod systems installed. The KC-30B achieved all Phase I objectives, including demonstration that the modified aircraft is free from buffet and flutter throughout the flight envelope. The Phase 1 testing obtained all test data required to support civil certification by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/eads-a330-based-tanker-royal-australian/story.aspx?guid=%7B1ADD5C01-DD16-43F6-ADC6-D59AB2D5F034%7D&dist=hppr

Certification by EASA may include the required speed limits for US Air Force.

“KC-767AT is derived from” is not correct. “KC-767AT will be derived from” or “KC-767AT may be derived from.” is better.
Never build,
never flown,
never tested.

171 posted on 07/15/2008 8:34:35 AM PDT by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: MHalblaub
It's all up to the Department of Defense, and how they rewrite the RFP. Game on!

Boeing to stick with KC-767 for US tanker recompete

FARNBOROUGH 2008: EADS to offer unchanged aircraft in relaunched KC-X contest

172 posted on 07/15/2008 9:10:39 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: MHalblaub

Oh well I’m sure that the Congress and Senate will kill the Scarebus anyway especially after the DOD is Changing the RFP again.

Kill the French P.O.S. Save american jobs and give us the Tanker that was requested in the Original RFP.

And that is what alot of air crews are saying on different Tanker blogs. Let alone at the Base Clubs.


180 posted on 07/16/2008 4:32:18 AM PDT by cmdr straker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson