Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frugal engine lies idle (Revetec update)
www.news.com.au ^ | 07/06/2008 | Brendan Quirk

Posted on 07/07/2008 5:56:08 AM PDT by Red Badger

[snip]. Well, we do have such a power plant and at the moment it is sitting doing not a lot really, in a Gold Coast workshop at Southport. It is a four-cylinder, 2.4 litre engine which has been independently certified as being the world's most efficient petrol engine. In other words, for a given amount of petrol burned this engine will do more work than any other anywhere in the world. During testing, the engine achieved a repeatable Brake Specific Fuel Consumption figure of 212g/kWh or 38.6 per cent efficiency, best figure achieved being 207g/kWh or 39.5 per cent efficiency. This figure is outstanding as the Toyota Prius Hybrid has a BSFC figure of 236g/kWh or 34.7 per cent efficiency. And this is still while the Revetec engine is in a crude state, at a stage of development designer Brad Howell-Smith says is barely off the drawing board. And there is no magic involved. It doesn't run on water or hydrogen or incorporate some hitherto undiscovered metallurgy. There is no sealed black box, which will self-destruct on opening, that performs this feat. Howell-Smith has simply taken the most inefficient part of the usual internal combustion engine found in 99.9 per cent of cars and replaced it with something far more efficient. [snip] Revetec had to match the grant and the $2 million engine is now as developed as Howell-Smith and his machinist Paul Moitzi can make it. "We have the world's most efficient engine and that is with very crude cylinder head technology. We made the cylinder heads from a solid billet of aluminium and there is a huge amount of improvement that can be made with better heads,"

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: auto; aviation; energy; engine; transportation

1 posted on 07/07/2008 5:56:09 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; Uncledave

http://www.revetec.com/

very cool!


2 posted on 07/07/2008 6:02:37 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Good video here of the concept:

http://www.revetec.com/development.htm

Looks sensible to me...


3 posted on 07/07/2008 6:04:28 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

how much hp? can it get out of it’s own way?


4 posted on 07/07/2008 6:07:07 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

They say it will flip the trike over.

I’d like to see this in a VW or Porsche on a 1/4 mile track.


5 posted on 07/07/2008 6:10:51 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Cool design.


6 posted on 07/07/2008 6:11:36 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt


X-engine ping.

7 posted on 07/07/2008 6:12:39 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: camle

http://www.revetec.com/gallery_video_033.htm


8 posted on 07/07/2008 6:17:21 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
How about a new 12 cylinder Jaguar XKE retro version?


9 posted on 07/07/2008 6:23:56 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

That X4 layout does make sense for an aircraft engine. Should be interesting to see if they get any takers to develop the cam concept further...I’d love to see if it can do what they say it does when scaled up into, say, a normal inline 4 or V6.

}:-)4


10 posted on 07/07/2008 7:00:20 AM PDT by Moose4 (http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The center bearings of the rollers attached to the pistons look like they’d have some pretty high forces acting on them. I suspect there might be a longevity problem there.


11 posted on 07/07/2008 7:00:49 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Ping for later


12 posted on 07/07/2008 7:22:14 AM PDT by ChiefJayStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
How about a Diesel version? Maybe 50% efficiently? I think any thing other than a radial will have too high a manufacturing cost. Radial engines have a single throw crank. I think the X configuration would be as wide as you would want to put in a vehicle. You could make 4,8,12, ad inf, versions. For balance greater # of cylinders than 4 are in odd numbers 5,7,9, etc.
barbra ann
13 posted on 07/07/2008 8:28:08 AM PDT by barb-tex ( A prudent man (more so for a woman) foreseeth the evil and hideth him self,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

DARPA?


14 posted on 07/07/2008 8:46:03 AM PDT by oneolcop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

i dunno. there’s something doubtful - if this was all it claims to be, it would already be in production.


15 posted on 07/07/2008 8:50:33 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: camle

They did say the US military is very interested, and working on an X config for unmanned drones.


16 posted on 07/07/2008 3:55:24 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

That trike is an old VW-trike conversion. Was real popular in the 80’s but with an old air cooled VW in the back driving thru the VW transaxle. With a stock 52HP bug engine in it you better not start out in 1st gear or the front wheel is coming off the ground. They have replaced a 180 lb. VW engine with this thing that weighs more and puts out more HP and expects everybody to be “wowed” by the wheelies. I would venture to say that sitting still if you sat on the engine, the front wheel would come off the ground.

All that aside, this thing looks interesting but I am concerned about the durability of the cranklobe/piston interface.


17 posted on 07/07/2008 6:57:42 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: biff

Yes, those roller bearings would be the weak point.


18 posted on 07/08/2008 5:12:11 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson