Skip to comments.
Jindal signs gun bill
The Morning Advocate ^
| July 4, 2008
Posted on 07/06/2008 5:54:26 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
Bobby Jindal signs bill giving employees the right to have firearms in their automobiles "on company property".
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; employerrights; employmentatwill; freedomofcontract; guns; louisiana; propertyrights; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
AP via Morning Advocate
To: Wonder Warthog
Good for Bobby!!!
For some reason I think he needs to run fast and far from McCain’s VP rumors...
Louisiana needs Bobby Jindal more than McCain needs him...
Now if we could only get our Texas legislators off their collective arses on this same issue...We tried it back in 2007, almost got it to the floor for a vote, but the session closed...
I think we have a good chance in 2009 to get this same type of bill thru this time...
2
posted on
07/06/2008 5:58:06 AM PDT
by
stevie_d_64
(Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
To: Wonder Warthog
The trade associations say the bill interferes with employers' right to decide whether to allow firearms on their property.
I would be more impressed with this line of argument if the trade associations made as big a stink about employers allowing smoking on the premises or anti-gun laws in other states that forbid possession of firearms in many private businesses.
For my part, I support the right of the employee to a safer workplace, that means having access to protection.
3
posted on
07/06/2008 6:00:37 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: stevie_d_64
Absolutly correct. Texas needs 100% Open Carry as well.
4
posted on
07/06/2008 6:09:19 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Wonder Warthog
He does not have any authority to give that right - we already have it.
5
posted on
07/06/2008 6:11:37 AM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(Seinfeld was a show about nothing - so is Obama.)
To: Dr. Sivana
"The trade associations say the bill interferes with employers' right to decide whether to allow firearms on their property." I've always contended (and still do), that an employee keeping a firearm in his car "is" keeping it on HIS (not the employers) property. It is none of the company's business what any specific "thing" an employee has inside his car, as long as said "thing" isn't taken OUT of the car.
As was said upthread---"Good for Bobby" (and, of course, the legislators who voted in favor).
6
posted on
07/06/2008 6:15:48 AM PDT
by
Wonder Warthog
(The Hog of Steel-NRA)
To: Wonder Warthog
Thank you, NRA. They’re on a roll.
7
posted on
07/06/2008 6:24:39 AM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA - Vote against the dem party)
To: TLI
8
posted on
07/06/2008 6:33:36 AM PDT
by
houeto
("Drill Here! Drill Now!")
To: Wonder Warthog
So like, where is that dude that always slams him on this forum?
9
posted on
07/06/2008 6:35:23 AM PDT
by
correctthought
(Hippies, want to change the world, but all they ever do is smoke pot and smell bad)
To: Wonder Warthog
Down with private property!
10
posted on
07/06/2008 6:38:39 AM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Wonder Warthog
Uh, Oh.
Louisiana is turning into "The Wild West". We can expect screaming headlines about plant shootings momentarily...
11
posted on
07/06/2008 6:51:54 AM PDT
by
Gritty
(Mandatory gun-free zones are in reality free-crime zones - John Stossel)
To: Gritty
"Louisiana is turning into "The Wild West". We can expect screaming headlines about plant shootings momentarily... " LOL---so true--whether such shootings actually happen or not.
To: Wonder Warthog
Bobby Jindl for President!
To: captjanaway
Sorry.. my “a” stuck......
Bobby Jindal for President!
To: houeto
15
posted on
07/06/2008 7:27:49 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: houeto
“responsibility to defend their self”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I cannot sign a petition containing such language as is displayed above. My fifth grade teacher would have gone berserk if I had written that line.
16
posted on
07/06/2008 7:29:54 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
To: stevie_d_64
We can hope it makes it too a vote ! .........and passes !
17
posted on
07/06/2008 7:33:40 AM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: RipSawyer
"1. Every individual has the right and responsibility to defend their self against unjustified threats of death or serious bodily injury. "How should this statement have been written?
18
posted on
07/06/2008 7:44:09 AM PDT
by
houeto
("Drill Here! Drill Now!")
To: correctthought
I think he left after Jindal vetoed the pay raises.
19
posted on
07/06/2008 9:25:57 AM PDT
by
03A3
To: correctthought; abb
abb, your Jindal commentary is anxiously awaited.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson