Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Standards Set For Energy-conserving LED Lighting
Science Daily ^ | 7-1-2008 | National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Posted on 06/30/2008 9:34:54 PM PDT by blam

Standards Set For Energy-conserving LED Lighting

These solid-state lights are powered by energy-efficient light emitting diodes and are among the first ones of a new generation expected to cut energy needed for lighting by 50 percent by 2027. (Credit: NIST)

ScienceDaily (July 1, 2008) — Scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in cooperation with national standards organizations, have taken the lead in developing the first two standards for solid-state lighting in the United States. This new generation lighting technology uses light-emitting diodes (LEDs) instead of incandescent filaments or fluorescent tubes to produce illumination that cuts energy consumption significantly.

Standards are important to ensure that products will have high quality and their performance will be specified uniformly for commerce and trade. These standards--the most recent of which published last month--detail the color specifications of LED lamps and LED light fixtures, and the test methods that manufacturers should use when testing these solid-state lighting products for total light output, energy consumption and chromaticity, or color quality.

Solid-state lighting is expected to significantly reduce the amount of energy needed for general lighting, including residential, commercial and street lighting. "Lighting," explains NIST scientist Yoshi Ohno, "uses 22 percent of the electricity and 8 percent of the total energy spent in the country, so the energy savings in lighting will have a huge impact."

Solid-state lighting is expected to be twice as energy efficient as fluorescent lamps and 10 times more efficient than incandescent lamps, although the current products are still at their early stages. Ohno chaired the task groups that developed these new standards.

In addition to saving energy, the new lighting, if designed appropriately, can produce better color rendering--how colors of objects look under the illumination--than fluorescent lamps or even incandescent lamps, Ohno says.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; led; lighting; nist; standards
I've probably been a little quick on the draw, I've already made a lifetime buy of incandescent bulbs. So....
1 posted on 06/30/2008 9:34:55 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

How can we survive without Mercury?


2 posted on 06/30/2008 9:39:36 PM PDT by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I would imagine that the standards will be more applicable to the power supplies, rather then the LEDs.


3 posted on 06/30/2008 9:43:49 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

LEDs will eclipse CFLs. But they have to get rid of the blue color.


4 posted on 06/30/2008 9:44:31 PM PDT by exit82 (Are the environmentalists gonna pay my heating bill this winter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

They already have. I have a set of white, not blue, LEDs in my car serving as dome lights.


5 posted on 06/30/2008 9:47:39 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Agree. CFLs will be a non-issue soon.


6 posted on 06/30/2008 9:48:46 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exit82

"I actually thought it looked very easy to make blue LEDs," says Shuji Nakamura of Nichia Chemical Industries Ltd., Tokushima, Japan. "I thought, blue means I just have to change the color—I just have to change the material."

Nichia 's Shuji Nakamura: Dream of the Blue Laser Diode

7 posted on 06/30/2008 9:49:11 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I was never a fan of LED lights. But then I bought a small led light that uses one AA battery. VERY bright WHITE light. Uses some microchip or something to get the brightness out of that one LED, and the battery lasts a LONG time. Pretty much as bright as my tactical light that has a halogen bulb with 2 lithium photo batteries. (That never seem to last very long?)

As long as the LED bulbs can get dwon near the price of the regular ones with decent color, etc. it sounds good to me.


8 posted on 06/30/2008 9:52:14 PM PDT by 21twelve (Don't wish for peace. Pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
"Agree. CFLs will be a non-issue soon."

Yup. Stay with incandescent and just go from incandescent directly to LED and not polute your house with mercury from CFL's.

Maybe buy a few extra incandescents before 2012 when they'll stop making them.

9 posted on 06/30/2008 9:53:12 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
L.E.D. lighting ( or lights ) last far longer than even the supposed CFL lighting that they claim last 10 times more than regular bulbs.

10 posted on 06/30/2008 10:11:25 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

It’s insanity to require people to have a CFL or LED in an attic, or a crawlspace, or screwed into the garage door opener.


11 posted on 06/30/2008 10:14:27 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

I call it my Nerd Light.

12 posted on 06/30/2008 10:20:27 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mark
How can we survive without Mercury?

I wonder how much $ the powers that be have invested in the CFL's = getting contracts with China, the only only one that would be producing them = and then mandating that every household must buy them = is going to go down the drain.

Warms the cockles of the heart, it does.

Free market trumps Marxism/

13 posted on 06/30/2008 10:25:37 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (No trees were killed in sending this message but a large number of electrons were terrible agitated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

I think it will still be several years before LED lighting becomes cost-effective (or even possible in higher power lighting).Furthermore, as they push the technology to it’s limits, heat goes up and reliability goes down. I have 35+ year old (very small and dim) LED’s that work fine. OTOH, I’ve seen a lot of cars driving around with “lifetime” LED taillights missing a few. The colors of both CCFL and LED lighting are not exactly flattering, either. LED’s use a few semi-exotic materials, too, like indium and gallium. The Wikipedia has a very scary reference to the world supplies of these elements.


14 posted on 06/30/2008 10:28:45 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

:D


15 posted on 06/30/2008 11:57:18 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam

They aren’t yet there on brightness per dollar. Not even close. But improving.


16 posted on 07/01/2008 6:00:50 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don't kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson