Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank
Even though the Court’s opinion leaves room for laws regulating guns in schools and government buildings, as well as restricting “dangerous and unusual weapons,”

Won't we just be amazed at what the left comes up with when they define "dangerous and unusual weapons".

If it fires multiple rounds, it's dangerous, can't have that.

It's a single shot 50 cal, it's unusual, can't have that.

It's a pistol that fires .410 shells, both dangerous and unusual, can't have that.

You can keep a cap and ball pistol {hammer removed} as long as the powder is in a different room.

4 posted on 06/30/2008 4:36:29 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: USS Alaska

Yeah, but if you actually read the decision, Scalia is all but *begging* people to bring cases (crafted with the same care as Heller) forward to decide *that* as well.

And since we got 5-4, with a possible Dem lock on the other two branches of government, we’re never going to get a better chance in the next 4-8 years.


5 posted on 06/30/2008 4:38:17 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson