To: Roccus
RO's are garbage. People don't learn that someone who wants to kill you isn't going to be stopped by a piece of paper or by the law. They're only going to be stopped by a gun! There are times in life when the law can't protect you and you are truly on your own. I'm just sayin' its the way of the world. Its up to you to protect your life.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
17 posted on
06/28/2008 11:23:29 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
No argument from me. But as I asked before, will any statements made by the victim when procuring the RO be allowed at the trial of the perp? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2036329/posts
22 posted on
06/28/2008 11:27:32 AM PDT by
Roccus
(The "P" in Democrat stands for Patriotism!)
To: goldstategop
RO’s do serve one purpose - if you DO have to blow away the subject of the RO, there isn’t even any question about whether you feared for your life or not. If you hadn’t feared for your life, you wouldn’t have gotten an RO, right? That’s the logic, and even libs won’t argue with that much.
Also, wasn’t the Lautenberg Amendment supposed to stop this sort of thing? Subjects of ROs not allowed to have guns? US. v. Emerson? Looks like gun control failed again. Anyone surprised?
25 posted on
06/28/2008 11:30:04 AM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson