Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran threatens to block Gulf oil route if attacked
Khaleej Times Online ^ | June 28, 2008 | Khaleej Times Online

Posted on 06/28/2008 6:36:04 AM PDT by John W

TEHERAN - Iran reiterated that it would block the oil export route in the Persian Gulf if attacked, a Teheran newspaper reported Saturday.

"It is understood that a country would use all possible options against an aggressor if militarily attacked. In that case, Iran would also intensify control of the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz," the commander of the paramilitary Revolutionary Guards told Jam'e Jam daily.

General Mohammad Ali Jafari also warned neighbouring countries not to take part in any military strike plans against Iran.

The general made the statement in reference to reports that the United States and Israel might attack the main Iranian nuclear site in Natanz, central Iran, after the Islamic state once again refused to suspend its uranium enrichment programme.

In earlier statements, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned that the country would be justified in using all options in the event of an attack. He also had not ruled out blocking the Persian Gulf blockade and using controls on oil supplies as a weapon.

A major part of regional oil exports are piped through the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, and a blockade could trigger a worldwide energy crisis.

Jafari also warned Israel that the Jewish state was within the range of Iranian missiles and indicated that any Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites would be retaliated against by missile attacks.

Earlier this month, the Israeli air force held an exercise that US officials say appeared to be a rehearsal for a potential attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Iran's medium-range Shahab-3 missile reportedly has a range of between 1,300 and 2,000 kilometres and is said to be able to reach any part of Israeli territory.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bombiran; energy; geopolitics; iran; iraniannukes; israel; oil; persiangulf; proliferation; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Bobalu
"Do these guys have no idea what out military is capable of??"

Unfortunately, they are betting that we have no resolve to support another skirmish in the region. They are gambling that we fear a war. A President Obama will pacify them.

21 posted on 06/28/2008 7:30:23 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John W

Liberals always accuse us for going to war over oil. Maybe just once we can give validity to their little rant. Lets go attack Iran, get rid of their nukes, monkey and mullahs.
Then we take over their oil as payback for Iranian influence in killing fellow Americans all these past years.
Turn the liberal lies into truth....sweet irony that would be!


22 posted on 06/28/2008 7:40:12 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator
Yes Sir.. I recall a You Tube flick where a US skipper says “ “Iranian War ship,Iranian War ship, heave to for I intend to sink you!!!!”.. I don’t think that had been said since the War of 1812 !!!
23 posted on 06/28/2008 7:45:43 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: John W

40% of world oil goes through the Straits of Hormuz.

Any blocking of those straits would constitute grounds for war.


24 posted on 06/28/2008 7:46:52 AM PDT by wildbill ( FR---changing history by erasing it from memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
If Iran really made a move to block the straits by attacking either international shipping vessels or (really foolish) a U. S. Navy vessel, they would lose their navy, air force and all ports within 24 hours.

They would have to wait for an Osama presidency - then BHO would sit down and talk with them - maybe even, send Madelene Albright or Jesse Jackson as a special envoy.

25 posted on 06/28/2008 7:54:53 AM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
In theory, they could block the Strait of Hormuz using mines. The marine underwriters would then cancel insurance on all the tanker traffic in the Gulf. This would effectively close it.

They tried this before -- Google "Operation Praying Mantis". The bottom line is the US sank the Iranian Navy, and they didn't do this again.

If the next President of the United States has a pair, they won't do this.

If the next President of the United States doesn't, and is going to respond by chain-smoking menthol cigarettes and put his thumb up his butt, we will have a problem.


26 posted on 06/28/2008 8:13:10 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

The world economic effect would depend on how long oil shipping through the Strait of Hormuz is suspended. If a day to a week, the effect would be minimal. If a month it would begin to be serious. If longer than three months it would take years to restabilize. It all depends on how soon and how large the Navy can move to neutralize the threat.


27 posted on 06/28/2008 8:13:34 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I’d say they could, at best, block it for a day. Their navy considers a speedboat a warship. The biggest potential threat would be mining which should be relatively easy to detect and stop.
I’d say a pipeline to get oil out via a less dangerous waterway would be advisable, but it’s hard to think of a country to run it through that I’d want having more power. I wouldn’t even trust Turkey with that much additional power.


28 posted on 06/28/2008 8:41:42 AM PDT by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John W

good, so we can clear out their ‘navy’ and see how they like having no ships to defend their ports


29 posted on 06/28/2008 8:41:50 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Good luck with your plans Iran. I’m pushing 50 and I’ll sign up to help defeat their plans. It’s either that or Dinty Moore Stew every day. We are fighting for our economic survival. The river is being dammed upstream by enemies.


30 posted on 06/28/2008 8:56:16 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse

We have airlines nearing collapse, laying off people, general malaise and discontent caused by other humans hoarding a resource. If it was water and we were dying from drought, we would have no qualms about taking steps to secure supplies.


31 posted on 06/28/2008 8:58:48 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

After our nukes vaporize the Iraninan government, there will not be anything left to block the Gulf oil routes.


32 posted on 06/28/2008 8:59:12 AM PDT by Stayfree (**********************************************FLUSH HILLARY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John W

If they want to see how we live without oil, they can find out what it’s like to live without water.


33 posted on 06/28/2008 9:09:15 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Within a week, every ship and plane Iran has would be utterly annihilated.
34 posted on 06/28/2008 9:24:13 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Do these guys have no idea what our military is capable of??

Yes, the Iranians know what out military is capable of.

The Iranian bluster is for the benefit of the liberal news media who are their anti-American propaganda allies and their Sheeple readers who do not know.

Operation Praying Mantis


Iranian frigate IS SAHAND (74) burns after being attacked by aircraft of Carrier Air Wing II from USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65) on 18 April 1988

35 posted on 06/28/2008 9:41:49 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu; Free ThinkerNY; freekitty; No Surrender No Retreat; ncfool; SouthTexas; gonzo; TXRed; ...

Is that before or after Obama dismantles our military and surrenders to terrorists around the world with the help of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and the rest of the Liberal traitors???


36 posted on 06/28/2008 9:44:44 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
One group, consisting of the destroyers USS Merrill (DD 976) and USS Lynde McCormick (DDG 8), plus the amphibious transport dock USS Trenton (LPD-14), neutralized the Sassan oil platform. The Iranian personnel on the platform were given the opportunity to abandon it for a tugboat waiting alongside, but instead chose to open fire on Merrill, whose 5 inch, 54 caliber guns quickly dispatched the smaller, platform-mounted Iranian gun. Immediately afterward, U.S. Marines from Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) 2-88 fast-roped onto the Sassan platform, gathered intelligence, and set explosives to render it unusable.

Big mistake.

37 posted on 06/28/2008 9:57:32 AM PDT by John123 (Obambi said that he has been in 57 states. I will now light myself on fire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

If I was a betting man, I’d say before winter.


38 posted on 06/28/2008 10:02:13 AM PDT by SouthTexas (Invert the 5-4 and you have no rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: John W

If we had been expanding the drilling for oil here at home then Iran’s threats wouldn’t have as much weight.


39 posted on 06/28/2008 12:05:11 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Without their (Fifth Fleet) consent, he will have difficulty enacting his plan.

Maybe, maybe not. Passive denial at choke points is easier than active defense. For instance, without deploying a single vessel, all the Iranians need to do is announce they mined the straits.

40 posted on 06/28/2008 1:59:40 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Vote McCain - It's better to hold your nose than grab your ankles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson