Posted on 06/28/2008 4:36:37 AM PDT by driftdiver
The real agenda here is exposed with this sentence "Then, there's the health curriculum. "(The district) only teaches abstinence," McKean said. "They don't teach safer sex practices."
Also look at the graphs at the bottom, STD rates for female is significantly higher than for males.
These are “known” rates. Reality is likely higher, but it’s still below the rate reported in the recent “shocking” report.
BTW, teaching abstinence-only is wrong. These kids should be taught about condoms, too...about how the CDC notes that condoms are ineffective in preventing the spread of HPV, the number one STD noted in that study and killer of thousands of American women annually.
‘BTW, teaching abstinence-only is wrong. These kids should be taught about condoms, too’
Do you really believe these kids don’t know what a condom is for? Do you honestly think the school or parents has never mentioned it?
I don’t.
I’ve read reports that close to 50% of women under the age of 45 have HPV.
Why estimate 10%? Why not 25% (as the CDC did) or 45%, or whatever it takes to scare people into thinking the system needs more money to teach preteens to screw around?
I thought the headline was anti-semitic until I realized it said STD’s and not SDT’s.
You should read all of my post again.
Condoms don’t stop HPV, and that’s the most prevalent example in the CDC study and thois one (along with herpes). Both are incurable.
They need to be taught this info.
I think the entire sex education debate is, and maybe always has been about far more than sex education. To hear the talk, it must take years and years of instruction (indoctrination) for kids to catch on to how pregnancy happens, how to prevent it, and about STDs.
You could cover pregnancy, contraception and STDs in one class session (including the banana or cucumber demo), give the kids a comprehensive (and short) pamphlet highlighting all the critical information, and then dismiss the class early.
Back before sex ed was even part of curricula, my 12 year-old friends and I knew all the basics, and our information was correct except we thought pregnancy was the automatic result of any sex without contraception.
This entire debate is about getting the kids in a classroom for hours and hours of indoctrination, year-after-year.
I agree kids need that information. I guess where we disagree is that they aren’t getting it but ignoring it. the old ‘it can’t happen to me’
When you think about the 3 biggest problems of adolescence - sex, drugs & alcohol - we counsel abstinence with only 2 of them. With sex, the left argues that they’re just going to do it anyway so we should teach safe sex practices. By that logic, why aren’t we teaching how to do a flaming shooter; proper food selection with boilermakers; the correct use of a hypodermic needle; and what to look for in a good crack pipe? Something very, very wrong out there.
You really think that parents are teaching “condoms don’t work”?!?
I agree, we are teaching our kids to be promiscuous. For the most part sex ed is encouraging the behavior. Like another poster said the information could be given in one session but the indoctrination takes a lot more time.
Abstinence works every time its used. Teach kids to value themselves and others.
I disagree tho that the left teaches kids to abstain from drugs and booze. perhaps on the surface but they certainly glamorize people who ruin their lives with it.
“You really think that parents are teaching “condoms don’t work”?!?”
Are you referring to condoms don’t prevent many diseases and are not 100% at preventing pregnancy. I have taught that to my kids.
Make parents responsible. Some will fall down and fail however the responsibility belongs with the parents.
A 15 year old girl complaining that abstinence teaching is the cause of all this? Perhaps they ARE learning about STDs, etc, in health class? We did “back in the day”, but were not taught how to use condoms or any other type of “how to do it safely” instruction. Our parents taught us. We were not innundated by television’s constant scenes of teens having sex (just watch ‘The N’ network for teens). Even “The Suite Life of Zack and Cody”, a Disney program for pre-teens may not be talking about sex, but they are constantly talking about going on dates, etc. Perhaps the quote that they “get bored and have sex” should be a wake up call to parents to give them more chores? Never heard of washing dishes causing pregnancy - nor a job at the local burger joint.....
We had ONE girl the entire time I was in high school who got pregnant. Just one......... STDs and HIV were completely unheard of.
I believe you are in the minority.
.....For the most part sex ed is encouraging the behavior....
Brittany Spears sister having a bastard is more important as a reason than Sex Ed . The hollywood sex machine is the problem
Let me clarify - when I said “our parents taught us”, it wasn’t about putting condoms on cucumbers - they taught us not to have sex until we were married, that - gee - you might end up pregnant and a child is a huge deterent to going to college and getting a decent job.....
The cucumber teachers have been effective, it seems.
Same school, two different sources. Looks like foxnews picked up the original.
Sure glad public schools are teaching these kids how to get STDs though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.