Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2008 9:40:37 PM PDT by Uncle Ralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Ralph

Grrr...


2 posted on 06/27/2008 9:41:55 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph

Wasn’t Dodd the chair of the DNC during the Clinton Chinagate scandal?


3 posted on 06/27/2008 9:49:45 PM PDT by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph

I want these s**theads in prison.


4 posted on 06/27/2008 9:53:29 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Congrasites = Congressional parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph
Corrupt bastards, every last one of them.

Being that they are Demopimps, this should be a minor speed bump for them.

Middle class choking on energy and food prices and the slime bags in Washington only care about themselves.

This is the ultimate “let them eat cake” moment.

6 posted on 06/27/2008 10:36:01 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph

“These allegations are too important not to investigate”—does that sound somewhat familiar?


7 posted on 06/27/2008 11:11:55 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph
I thought this was "old" news. Didn't they explain themselves? All is forgiven, they had no idea that they were getting a sweatheart deal.

After all they are just the Nations top lawmakers. That does not make them smart. right?

10 posted on 06/27/2008 11:19:26 PM PDT by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph

Mozilogate ping.
Here a video of the latest debate by the US senate on the Dodd-Shelby/BOA/Countrywide/Mozilo housing gambler-major financal who funds campaigns bailout bill. You can see Hillary, Kerry, Pelosi, Dodd, Shelby, Kennedy, Obama, Feinstein, and Cantwell involved.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIj4U2KLdn0


12 posted on 06/28/2008 1:33:20 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph

•Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., received $20,000 in campaign contributions from Countrywide Financial Corp. over the past two decades, more than any senator except Barack Obama, D-Ill., who received $22,900 as a first term senator.


13 posted on 06/28/2008 1:45:39 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph

Countrywide Corruption

By the Editors - National Review

The U.S. Senate is about to enact a massive subsidy for Countrywide Financial less than a week after revelations that the company’s “Friends of Angelo” sweetheart-loan program included two U.S. senators. It seems unthinkable, but it’s true. What’s worse? One of the two senators sponsored the bill.

The principal author of the Dodd-Shelby housing-bailout bill is Sen. Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, which has jurisdiction over the mortgage market. Last week, Portfolio magazine revealed that Dodd was one of two U.S. senators who benefited from a program under which Countrywide Financial gave loans at favorable terms to the influential and the powerful. The other senator was Kent Conrad, a Democrat from North Dakota.

The allegations against Conrad are damning enough. Though he denies having known he received preferential treatment, Conrad admitted to a Wall Street Journal reporter that he called Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo to ask for a loan on the advice of former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson, another beneficiary of the program. (Johnson resigned from Barack Obama’s running-mate vetting team after his involvement in the program was revealed.)

But as powerful as Conrad is, the allegations against Dodd are more disturbing because he wields so much power over Countrywide’s fortunes and because he has used that power to benefit Countrywide. According to Portfolio’s calculations, the preferential loan rates Dodd received on two mortgages could end up saving him $75,000. (Like Conrad, Dodd denies knowing that he received preferential treatment.)

The troubling nature of this arrangement becomes clear when one looks at the fine print of the Dodd-Shelby housing bill. Under the bill, mortgage lenders — of which Countrywide is the largest in the U.S. — would agree to renegotiate their most troubled home loans in exchange for a federal guarantee on those loans. If the borrowers who took out those troubled loans end up defaulting, the government would cover any losses the mortgage lenders incur.

Under the Dodd-Shelby bill, a fee collected from the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would fund this program. The House version of the bill would fund the program with tax dollars. Either way, the program would be “a government buyout of problem mortgages disguised as a refinancing plan,” as David C. John of the Heritage Foundation puts it in his analysis.

Defenders of Dodd’s bill insist that it’s not a bailout, because the lenders have to write down 15 percent of the value of a troubled loan in order to qualify for the program. The lenders, they insist, are taking a loss and bearing the consequences of the irresponsible lending in which they engaged during the housing boom.

But this argument omits the fact that if a troubled loan goes into foreclosure — a most likely destination for many of them — the lender faces an average loss of one-third of the value of the loan. Faced with this kind of loss, many lenders have an incentive to work something out with borrowers anyway, and many already have, taking advantage of the Bush administration’s voluntary Hope Now program to do just that.

The kind of loans that lenders would dump on the government under the Dodd-Shelby bailout would be the most radioactive on their books — the ones likely to default anyway. So concluded the Congressional Budget Office, which found that up to 35 percent of the loans refinanced through the Dodd-Shelby program would eventually default. The lenders wouldn’t have any exposure to those losses — they would be paid back through the fund created by the Dodd-Shelby bill.

And this is where we come full circle, back to Sen. Dodd and his sweetheart deal from Countrywide. The Dodd-Shelby housing-bailout bill would be bad public policy under any conditions. Lenders are already under severe pressure to write down loans for borrowers who still have a chance to make it. The bill is overwhelming slanted toward protecting lenders, like Countrywide, that lowered their standards dramatically on a bet that home prices would never go down and subsequently find themselves holding a lot of bad debt.

Congress should launch a full investigation of Countrywide’s program to influence the powerful; that much should go without saying. But if the Senate passes the Dodd-Shelby housing bailout before such an investigation can run its course — especially if that investigation finds that members of Congress were improperly influenced — it will have allowed Countrywide to take the money and run.


14 posted on 06/28/2008 1:51:44 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg; Last Dakotan

Ping


29 posted on 06/28/2008 9:08:58 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph
The only time the name Dodd crossed my path and elecited a smile was when the PAstor of a small Catholic Church up here in my neck of the woods sent Dodd his 10K donation back with a message. I'll translate into my vernacular.

Senator Dodd, take your abortion loving money and stick it where the sun don't shine.

I still smile when I think about that Pastor doing the right thing.

30 posted on 06/28/2008 9:13:28 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Ralph

So what is the surprise?

Their elected officals correct.

The average joe sixpack would be in jail by now.

These are the type of people who are making laws, but not for themselves only the tax payers and the voters, they could care less about them until it’s time for re-election.

Wake up voters, time to take out the trash.


32 posted on 06/28/2008 11:32:55 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson