Or at least have their mental stability questioned.
Posted on 06/26/2008 8:22:18 AM PDT by TSchmereL
AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back — just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, Maha-Rushie! America's Anchorman, Truth Detector, Doctor of Democracy, and Chief of the Patriotism Police. He is the man who runs America. He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to do--That's host. Get ready to what you were born to do--That's listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).
What a brainless twit of a female reporter Rush just aired....WOOOW.....
And as Rush is proving with this bit of sound clips, they are very stupid scum
Good for you! I should take a vacation from political discussion for a while, myself. It is highly addictive.
Nature will take care of that soon enough....their replacements however.........
Or at least have their mental stability questioned.
Someone from our office offered to teach a few of us to shoot—female ex-military. I might take her up on that.
Did you hear me on Q&R this morning?
Hi, RM!
What a bunch of socialists now in charge of the network media and newspapers. They won't give up on their assault of liberty, freedom and America itself.
Howdy, Roc...keeping the bar stocked?
Has Rush mentioned the quote in Post #28? (I had a phone call)
Good grief! Jeff Toobin is an absolute idiot! How can educated men come up with this kind of thinking?
Nah! Just tryin’ to empty it.
};^)
The big thing that I noticed after this decisiion was that the MSM only had left wing talkers on. I saw no right wing reporter given a chance to talk.
Don’t know—just got off a long phone call myself.
You were on Q&R?!!! I don’t listen but now that you’ve hit the
big time you must start calling Mark more. Even Rush!
Yo Oessiah,
How about you clueless Leftists try punish the criminals who use firearms rather then pass more useless laws on the law abiding citizens?
Email I just received from Tom Gresham.
Trust me on this one — the lawsuits are already written to set the stage for incorporation. This would require another journey through the court system, to the Supreme Court. Some very smart people have mapped that trek, and they are lacing on their hiking boots.
As you talk with friends about this case, and you write letters to the editor (because we just know the papers will take a decidedly anti-gun rights slant to this), you might try this one. For some reason, many people get confused with the grammar and structure of the Second Amendment’s wording. They have said that the first part (”A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state . . .” restricts the second part, so that only the militia has the “right to keep and bear arms.”
Try this one. “A well-educated people, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed.” Now, ask them if this means that only well-educated people could keep and read books, or does it mean that everyone can have books as a means to produce a well-educated people.
Yes, there will be wailing from the loons on both sides of this issue. On the gun rights side, some have fretted that Alan Gura threw them under the bus by telling the court that this case is not about machine guns. Some folks drive fast with only their parking lights on, I guess, rendering them incapable of seeing very far down the road. If Gura had told the court he wanted to remove the (illegal) restrictions on machine guns, the court would have ruled against gun rights.
Patience, Grasshopper. We now have one foot solidly on the rock of constitutional rights. Now, we begin.
This will be the big story for the next week, and it will certainly affect the presidential election. While it’s clear to anyone who isn’t a fool that Obama has a solid record of supporting not only restrictions on citizens’ gun rights, but he actually favors gun bans, the Heller decision will force a discussion on gun rights. It also will bring the all-important subject of Supreme Court nominations into the discussion.
Tune in to Sunday’s Gun Talk radio show for the latest news and analysis on this ground-breaking gun rights case.
Tom Gresham
Good lord, did Obama just claim that the DC ban kept guns out of the hands of criminals? Hey Obama, THEY”RE CRIMINALS YOU DOLT!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.