[omega4179]

n a dissent he summarized from the bench, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority “would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons.”

He said such evidence “is nowhere to be found.”??????

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a separate dissent in which he said, “In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas.”
APPALLING LEFT WING ARROGANT IGNORANCE!!!

[TexanToTheCore]

Those statements would have been better left unwritten. They show a stunning lack of understanding of the original intent of the Founding Fathers as well as ignorance of our own legal and social history.

I would not have allowed those words to be published.

[DoughtyOne]

How does any sane person come away from the amendments and conclude that the second is the only one that doesn’t grant rights to all individual citizens?

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a separate dissent in which he said, “In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas.”

I bet he wrote that from his idyllic cottage in fairy tale Cambridge, MA (crime rate 0.001 on a scale of 100).