Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

Yea, the Blue Dogs, while a minority over there, do have a good deal of common sense on this issue at least.

Any idea if this ruling extends beyond DC? i.e. is this a precedent that can knock down odious restrictions in places like Massachusetts? Or is this a in effect a one-time ruling since DC isn’t actually a state?


507 posted on 06/26/2008 7:46:03 AM PDT by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]


To: mquinn

By the way Obama released a comment saying he agrees with the courts decision.


514 posted on 06/26/2008 7:47:13 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, freerepublic.com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

To: mquinn

If you read some of the posts on the majority decision you’ll see that they

“held” that the 2nd amendment protects the INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to keep and bear arms, and that the “prefatory clause” referring to the militia neither restricts nor expands this right.

VERY BIG. VERY GUTSY. (very surprising - I was expecting, as you did, a narrow ruling that didn’t put this issue to bed)


557 posted on 06/26/2008 7:55:28 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson