I respectfully disagree, and suggest the statement applies more to you.
Google up the opinion and read it and see if you have the same idea.
I will, but the words of the opinion won't change the fact that the quote from it that you posted is a non-sequitur, with as much validity as "We uphold all provisions of Article IX of the Constitution."
Of course, you might be Robert Paulsen in disguise and then it wouldnt matter.
Well, if I'm Robert Paulsen in disguise, with deep enough cover that I argue directly against the views that he used to love to express here, then what does it matter?
BTW, are you Souter, Breyer, Stevens, or Ginsburg?
Ok I guess reading a court opinion would be too much for your pea brain.