Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
No, it is not admissable - unless he is being prosecuted not for her murder but for the beating that took place on the day of the 911 call.

Say, for example, he was being prosecuted solely for assaulting her and while the prosecution was preparing to go to trial she was hit by a city bus and killed in front of witnesses.

The prosecution would not have a complaining witness, but they would have her excited utterance on the 911 tape.

30 posted on 06/25/2008 1:40:46 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

Thanks for the response. I think we’re in agreement.

I will say that the bus incident wasn’t what I was thinking of. I was thinking more along the lines of her being found dead in the same apartment where the police responded weeks earlier.


31 posted on 06/25/2008 1:47:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake
Couldn't the prior phone call be used as evidence of violent intent in the past and the basis for a ‘motive’? I plead ignorance about the legal technicalities here.
39 posted on 06/25/2008 3:13:37 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson