Other folks have covered the ground of examining the pixels — which show the document is digital image confection, not a laser print on a stock certificate form. I’ll stick with two things I noted from the first. One — no embossed seal — it’s not not an official certificate then. Two: there is an entry for father’s race as “African”. Circa 1961 that term wasn’t used as a race. The term would have been “Negro”, if any used at all.
Other folks have covered the ground of examining the pixels — which show the document is digital image confection, not a laser print on a stock certificate form.
So it was scanned into the computer. That’s proof?
I’ll stick with two things I noted from the first. One — no embossed seal — it’s not not an official certificate then.
I have some with an embossed seal, some without. Many from that era had no embossed deal. That’s proof?
Two: there is an entry for father’s race as “African”. Circa 1961 that term wasn’t used as a race. The term would have been “Negro”, if any used at all.
It was whatever the clerk typist chose to type in. That’s proof?
You are not even 5% there.
The correspondent. presumably the mother, provided the racial identifer (if anyone did). His baby daddy was not present having already abandoned his woman to go to Harvard.
In ancient times they'd said the god Mars must have impregnated her or something. Old, old story eh~!
The correspondent. presumably the mother, provided the racial identifer (if anyone did). His baby daddy was not present having already abandoned his woman to go to Harvard.
In ancient times they'd said the god Mars must have impregnated her or something. Old, old story eh~!