Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Polarik

Yes, it has been shown conclusively that this type of modern printed document is used for birth certification, but as you know, that is not the issue.

The issues are: a) Evidence that the Kos/Obama version has been tampered with, b) no official certification at all, and c) these modern docs do not even come close to revealing the kind of information that would be revealed on a copy of his birth certificate.


25 posted on 06/24/2008 8:01:50 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

With all due respect, for me, the only issue that matters is the one that I alone raised, which is that key pieces of text on the Obama document were deliberately REPLACED for some as yet unknown purpose.

The altered text IS the issue, for it says right on the “modern document” that any alteration invalidates the document.

We cannot know if Hawaii used AFRICAN as a race, but IT DOES NOT MATTER, since we have not determined what they could or could not list.

What does matter is that the text was altered, and perhaps the reason why this document has no seal or signatures is intentional.

Why?

Did the Kos or Smears ever state that this is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Obama?

I don’t think so.

They have committed fraud, but have they broken any state or federal laws by posting these and calling them Obama’s birth certificate?

Sadly, NO!

That’s the rub.


33 posted on 06/24/2008 9:31:30 PM PDT by Polarik (The Greater Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson