Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Turret Gunner A20
Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, says his objection is very basic – the Constitution doesn’t authorize Congress to do anything remotely like banning a product that has been used safely and efficiently for more than 100 years in favor of Chinese-imported compact fluorescent light bulbs that pose considerable health and safety risks.

You mean they can't find anything in the General Welfare clause, or the Commerce clause?

-PJ

14 posted on 06/23/2008 8:36:37 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

Lightbulbs are shipped across state lines, so they are subject to regulation under the Interstate Commerce Clause.

This is what they use to justify EVERYTHING.

The founders CLEARLY meant that the feds could intervene only when there was a dispute between the states.


19 posted on 06/23/2008 8:39:14 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

It must be there somewhere, emanating from under that prenumbra...


53 posted on 06/23/2008 9:17:50 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson