Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toehold in Tehran?
Washington Post ^ | June 23, 2008

Posted on 06/23/2008 5:17:40 AM PDT by nuconvert

Toehold in Tehran?

By Fred Hiatt

June 23, 2008

A smart idea to shake up U.S. policy and reach out to the Iranian people is being debated in Washington, but the debate isn't taking place within or between the presidential campaigns. It's going on inside the Bush administration.

Senior officials at the State Department and beyond are mulling a proposal to open an interest section in Tehran, similar to the one the United States has operated in Havana since 1977. This would fall short of full diplomatic recognition, but it would open a channel to the Iranian people and, maybe, eventually, to the regime as well.

The idea has been under discussion for close to two years and could be adopted within weeks -- though officials continue to worry about how to package such a proposal without having it appear, one said, "as a sign of weakness." They worry about the effect of such a signal on Iran, on U.S. negotiating partners in Europe and on domestic politics, given the clash between Barack Obama and John McCain about the wisdom of negotiating with Iranian leaders.

Beneath the debate is an effort by the administration to bequeath to its successor a foreign policy on something of an even keel, and a belief that Iran may be the relationship furthest from achieving that.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: interestsection; iran; statedepartment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2008 5:17:40 AM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Stick any American in there and have anything happen to Iran’s nuke facilities, and you’ll have instant hostages.

No thanks.


2 posted on 06/23/2008 5:19:55 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (This tagline is completely naked - STOP STARING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Oh, yeah, what a lovely insane idea — just hand the Mullahocracy some hostages on a silver platter.

Who thought up this idiocy?


3 posted on 06/23/2008 5:22:03 AM PDT by Enchante (Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

” and you’ll have instant hostages “

Been there - done that - got the embassy....

Upon further reflection, the last time we gave the Iranians a gaggle of hostages, it virtually ensured the election of Ronald Reagan...

Hmmmmmmm........


4 posted on 06/23/2008 5:25:06 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Sometimes I sets and thinks, and sometimes I jus' sets.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
A smart idea to shake up U.S. policy and reach out to the Iranian people is being debated in Washington...

Reach out to the Iranian people? what good would *that* do? Do these clowns really think that the Iranian people have any say about how their country is run? Do they think that the 9th Century pigfornicators running Iran give a hoot about "popular opinion"?

Geeze....talk about naive!

5 posted on 06/23/2008 5:25:14 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The problem with the rat race is,even if you win you're still a rat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Is Jimmy Carter working in the State Dept.?


6 posted on 06/23/2008 5:26:42 AM PDT by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Senior officials at the State Department...

Yeah, State Dept. Maddie Albright holdovers maybe? Hostage bait perhaps? If they only know us they'll like us. Can't we all just get along?

7 posted on 06/23/2008 5:30:41 AM PDT by Obadiah (I remember when the climate never changed, then Bush stole the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Puts me in mind of "Night of the Living Dead" when one of the zhombies grabs the microphone to a police radio and says "Send more cops!"

"Send more hostages"

8 posted on 06/23/2008 5:30:44 AM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; freedom44; Valin; odds; sionnsar; LibreOuMort; Pan_Yans Wife; Army Air Corps; GOPJ

? pong


9 posted on 06/23/2008 5:31:52 AM PDT by nuconvert (Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

They are not holdovers in the Red infested State Dept....they been there a long time...the red dooper diaper children are now in policy control @ State and have been so since becoming enscounced during FDR’s Fascist reign!


10 posted on 06/23/2008 5:36:08 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
The Iranians might say no, though with difficulty, given that they already operate an active interest section of their own on Wisconsin Avenue in Glover Park... And if they did say no, administration officials argue, it would only enhance America's image and make the Iranians seem scared of contact.

Aim it at young people (under the age of 35) with nothing overt - a displayed of American style - and it might work - - a freedom is fun and challenging kind of setup...

11 posted on 06/23/2008 5:38:11 AM PDT by GOPJ (Congress:Screw speculators, DRILL. Prices goes down-speculators lose their shirts.FreeperDilbert56)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

I thought the same thing. Why is it some people don’t learn from the past?


12 posted on 06/23/2008 5:39:10 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Why does not the entire State Dept simply move to Tehran?

In that honest move, they can all then mutually
support terrorists, murderers and slavery.


13 posted on 06/23/2008 6:03:35 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

This presidency is not just lost, its marooned.


14 posted on 06/23/2008 6:06:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
A smart idea to shake up U.S. policy and reach out to the Iranian people...

Smart? Fred Hiatt of the WaPo thinks it's smart to give AlmondineJihad an organized little group of hostages. So does the State Dept.

I guess it COULD be a smart idea depending on what your actual goal is.

15 posted on 06/23/2008 6:21:20 AM PDT by Sal (Question Him, you're an attacker; Disagree with Him, you're a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
"A smart idea to shake up U.S. policy and reach out to the Iranian people is being debated in Washington"

TRANSLATIONS

We, the self serving, spineless Hate-America-First media frame the debate and set the baseline for no one to question that the extremely LIBERAL idea of only giving in to Iran...is being debated in Washington.

16 posted on 06/23/2008 6:26:16 AM PDT by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ICE-FLYER

I am all for it.....but lets send them Charlie Manson and Jimmy Carter to run the place!!


17 posted on 06/23/2008 7:04:50 AM PDT by Wavrnr10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

State Dep’t “professionals”. With Condi’s approval; anyone still want her for veep?


18 posted on 06/23/2008 8:10:30 AM PDT by steve8714 (If they leave you alone are you free or at peace?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Beneath the debate is an effort by the administration to bequeath to its successor a foreign policy on something of an even keel, and a belief that Iran may be the relationship furthest from achieving that.

That shows some honesty in thinking.

19 posted on 06/23/2008 11:03:26 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

I thought that American interest sections could be as little as a desk in someone else’s embassy. Usually, it is staffed by English speaking nationals of that embassy.

I seem to recall something about this in the movie “Not without my daughter”, with (actress) Sally Fields chatting with a Swiss or Swedish staffer about her custody issue in Iran.


20 posted on 06/23/2008 11:24:32 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson