What and where am I taking anything out on other posters. Geez you create some melodrama in your head sometimes. I merely started out on this thread remarking on several facts missed by others. One, that the article title and lead in paragraph are not what the article is about, and two, the lawyer making the motions is the same lawyer that frequents what I think to be a sham show - Nancy Grace. After what she did to the Duke boys as I followed closely on durhaminwonderland.com , and the lady that committed suicide. Forget about that episode in her history?
Nevertheless, if some other lawyers come forward perhaps they might actually crack the silence if there is truly any of that stuff going on. So far - nada, zip, zilch.
Maybe you should start a thread on Nancy Grace.
Frankly, I shudder just mentioning her name.
“Nevertheless, if some other lawyers come forward perhaps they might actually crack the silence if there is truly any of that stuff going on. So far - nada, zip, zilch.”
So far, none. That’s a good thing, right?
Actually though, it was only the title that was misleading.
Here are the first two sentences of the article.
A lawyer for the 16-year-old daughter of polygamist group leader Warren Jeffs is requesting a restraining order to prevent a spokesman for the group from intimidating and harassing the girl.
The request for a restraining order against Willie Jessop was filed in San Angelo today by Natalie Malonis.
The TITLE was definitely the 'misleading' item.
And they don't give you the details until you read on, and they spread them out, sometimes in an apparent attempt to mislead the reader.
I guess it all depends on the reader.