Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flo Nightengale

Now wait, I don’t quite understand this article.

The way this starts out is that the 16 year old has asked for this but in reality she has asked for a new lawyer, so the lawyer filed these papers. Was this the same lawyer on Nancy Grace a few weeks back?

So the girl doesn’t want any part of the attorney’s allegations, wants a new lawyer, and the judge refuses and accepts the attorney’ “order”.

This is hilarious.


36 posted on 06/21/2008 5:41:14 AM PDT by commonguymd (Freedom and individual liberty is for everyone, including the odd and weird people like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: commonguymd

The attorney is an “attorney ad litem” whose sole rsponsibility is to represent “the best interest of the child”. The child does not get a new attorney just because the flds doesn’t like the way this one is handling the case. It is up to the Court to decide if undue influence is at work here.


40 posted on 06/21/2008 7:46:48 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: commonguymd

The girl is 16 years old. She is a minor child and cannot ‘ask’ for anything. Both the child’s attorney, Natalie Malonis, and her guardian ad litem, Connie Gauwain, were in agreement that a motion be filed asking for a restraining order against Willie Jessop. They thought it to be in the best interest of the child.

Willie the Thug wants a new lawyer for the girl - one that approves of the flds way of life. Are you an attorney? If so, you could volunteer your services.


58 posted on 06/21/2008 9:44:06 AM PDT by Alice in Wonderland (4-Hshootingsports.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson