“Well let us look at the facts. Both the attorney and the guardian were appointed by Judge Walthers. Who has now granted a restraining order against Jessops. Does it strike you as odd that Walthers is still presiding over this case?”
No.
Maybe it’s because you don’t understand the law.
“Or could the more plausible explanation be that when the Lady was being ‘detained’ that she said whatever she thought would help get her released. Now that she is free she no longer wishes to cooperate with her former captors.”
I have stated much the same thing, on several threads.
Along with other possibilities. I think it is the most likely explanation.
Don’t blame you for saying Huh. I wasn’t very clear.
There is a civil lawsuit going on at the same time the hearings for the Grand Jury are occurring.
It might be Pamela who is the lead on that one, not Teresa.
Maybe not, but I know more about the law than you do : )
There is a civil lawsuit going on at the same time the hearings for the Grand Jury are occurring.
Right and the Constitution provides no guarantees against self incrimination in a Civil case. That is why what the CPS did was so heinous. They are trying to use Civil laws to make a Criminal case. In other words, they are trying to side step the Constitution in their prosecution of the FLDS.