[LeGrande]

Maybe it’s because you don’t understand the law.

Maybe not, but I know more about the law than you do : )

There is a civil lawsuit going on at the same time the hearings for the Grand Jury are occurring.

Right and the Constitution provides no guarantees against self incrimination in a Civil case. That is why what the CPS did was so heinous. They are trying to use Civil laws to make a Criminal case. In other words, they are trying to side step the Constitution in their prosecution of the FLDS.

[UCANSEE2]

“They are trying to use Civil laws to make a Criminal case.”

Are they now?

I wasn’t aware the CPS pursued criminal cases.
I thought that was the Prosecutor, and LE.

[UCANSEE2]

“Right and the Constitution provides no guarantees against self incrimination in a Civil case. That is why what the CPS did was so heinous. They are trying to use Civil laws to make a Criminal case. In other words, they are trying to side step the Constitution in their prosecution of the FLDS.”

So maybe they should ask Kevin for help.

Just don’t let them go to the Brown Brothers.

[UCANSEE2]

“Maybe not, but I know more about the law than you do : )”

Maybe. I guess a lawyer would know more about the law.

However, you said lawyers were only interested in winning, not in the truth of the case.

So, if you are a lawyer, that would explain your viewpoint, and many of your posts.

Or, you could be a Judge. They know quite a bit about the law. Or are they just as blind?

---

BTW, I agree with you that many times, what happens in a court has little to do with what’s right, what’s fair, what justice should be.

Which is too bad for those who have to appear before the law.

I guess it’s irony because the one place you go to get justice, you can’t get it, because of the lawyers.