Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
Looking at the subject of this article, which is Willie, I think the mere fact that Willie was allowed at the table while the attorney talked with her, was sufficient to ‘intimidate’ the girl.

Well let us look at the facts. Both the attorney and the guardian were appointed by Judge Walthers. Who has now granted a restraining order against Jessops. Does it strike you as odd that Walthers is still presiding over this case? I am amazed.

So, she could have been led into ‘thinking’ the girl wanted to testify, and using Willie as an excuse for why her client has gone ‘sour’.

Or could the more plausible explanation be that when the Lady was being 'detained' that she said whatever she thought would help get her released. Now that she is free she no longer wishes to cooperate with her former captors.

This particular case (Warren’s daughter) may also be pivotal because it will set the precedent, and it involves a lawsuit against Warren and Crew for looting the UEP. Success for those FLDS members against Warren means they will get the money and property back that Warren stole from them.

Huh? Appearing before a Grand Jury is strictly criminal not civil.

300 posted on 06/22/2008 6:56:05 PM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: LeGrande

“Well let us look at the facts. Both the attorney and the guardian were appointed by Judge Walthers. Who has now granted a restraining order against Jessops. Does it strike you as odd that Walthers is still presiding over this case?”

No.


” I am amazed.”

Maybe it’s because you don’t understand the law.


“Or could the more plausible explanation be that when the Lady was being ‘detained’ that she said whatever she thought would help get her released. Now that she is free she no longer wishes to cooperate with her former captors.”

I have stated much the same thing, on several threads.
Along with other possibilities. I think it is the most likely explanation.


“Huh? Appearing before a Grand Jury is strictly criminal not civil.”

Don’t blame you for saying Huh. I wasn’t very clear.

There is a civil lawsuit going on at the same time the hearings for the Grand Jury are occurring.

It might be Pamela who is the lead on that one, not Teresa.


303 posted on 06/27/2008 7:15:31 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson