Actually the fact that you are asking the questions demonstrates that the Attorney is at fault. Can you imagine OJ's lawyers subpoenaing him to testify? LOL
Shouldn’t you wait until we see if any of this is true, and what is true first?
What isn't true? There is a clear conflict between the wishes of the Attorney and client. Did I miss something? Is this Attorney the Lady's guardian?
“Did I miss something? “
Well, apparently.
I just wait for you to catch up.
Actually the fact that you are asking the questions demonstrates that the Attorney is at fault. Can you imagine OJ's lawyers subpoenaing him to testify? LOL
Shouldn’t you wait until we see if any of this is true, and what is true first?
What isn't true? There is a clear conflict between the wishes of the Attorney and client. Did I miss something? Is this Attorney the Lady's guardian?
The child’s attorney is Natalie Malonis, and her guardian ad litem is Connie Gauwain.
Both Malonis and Gauwain allege that Willie Jessop has intimidated and improperly influenced the 16-year-old girl, encouraging her to seek a new attorney and to avoid service of a subpoena to appear before a grand jury next week in Schleicher County.
The subpoena came from the Texas Attorney Generals office. I don't think the child's attorney has the power to generate a subpoena.