Actually the fact that you are asking the questions demonstrates that the Attorney is at fault. Can you imagine OJ's lawyers subpoenaing him to testify? LOL
Shouldn’t you wait until we see if any of this is true, and what is true first?
What isn't true? There is a clear conflict between the wishes of the Attorney and client. Did I miss something? Is this Attorney the Lady's guardian?
The child’s attorney is Natalie Malonis, and her guardian ad litem is Connie Gauwain.
Both Malonis and Gauwain allege that Willie Jessop has intimidated and improperly influenced the 16-year-old girl, encouraging her to seek a new attorney and to avoid service of a subpoena to appear before a grand jury next week in Schleicher County.
The subpoena came from the Texas Attorney Generals office. I don't think the child's attorney has the power to generate a subpoena.
Is Connie Gauwain still her guardian now that she has been returned to the FLDS?
The subpoena came from the Texas Attorney Generals office. I don't think the child's attorney has the power to generate a subpoena.
No, but how many times have you seen a defense Attorney try to get a subpoena to a client that doesn't want it? LOL This Attorney did try to stop the Young Lady from going back, obviously against her wishes. I think that if my Attorneys worked against my wishes, they would be lucky to get away with only losing their license.