Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kellynla

Yes, the new buzzword/phrase (besides “Drilling now wouldn’t change anything”) is “68 MILLION ACRES!!!! that the oil companies are ignoring—they should develop all those places first—there’s no need to drill in places like ANWR or off of Florida or California!!”

Neal Cavuto highlighted this on his show today.


3 posted on 06/20/2008 3:19:00 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pillut48
ExxonMobil: Congressman, there's no seismic trace of any crude in that 2.1 million acres parcel.

Congressman Dumbshjt: Drill 'em anyway, and be certain, before we open up any more leases to you.

5 posted on 06/20/2008 3:23:02 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pillut48
68 MILLION ACRES!!!! that the oil companies are ignoring

Sorry to extract a portion of your sentence construction since that might miss the intent of the sentence. But, the article says that the leases need to be explored and if they turn up commercial quantities they would be developed; otherwise the land is worthless but the oil company owns the lease anyway. Congress doesn't know if oil/gas is present on those leases when they offer them for sale.

14 posted on 06/20/2008 4:15:39 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pillut48

Oh, yes! That’s all I’ve heard the past few days, that damn 68 MILLION ACRES!!! The idiots all stare at the camera like they’re Stepford wives, droning on and on about the blasted 68 million acres. Geez, they’re so STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!! Not an original thought, phrase, or the truth for that matter, ever comes out of their sorry mouths.


17 posted on 06/20/2008 4:21:32 PM PDT by fishergirl (My warrior, my soldier, my hero - my son. God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pillut48

Like the article said, that depends on if there is proven (recoverable) oil there. If there is, then fine, go get it. If there isn’t, then they’ve got to go elsewhere.

Just between us chickens, though, I imagine as soon as they find it and set up shop to go get it, that someone will file an environmental lawsuit about the endangered medium light brown earthworm.


18 posted on 06/20/2008 4:21:50 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pillut48
“68 MILLION ACRES!!!! there’s no need to drill in places like ANWR or off of Florida or California!!”

Sorry but that comment has me laughing my arse off. It only shows the ignorance of those that have no knowledge of oil. Just because you lease it, doesn’t mean there oil!

23 posted on 06/20/2008 4:48:51 PM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pillut48
He did yesterday, too. Neal is quite knowledgeable about the oil business—of course you don't have to be too knowledgeable to know more than most Congresscritters! They are clueless as to how idiotic that sounds to anyone who knows ANYTHING about the oil business!!
31 posted on 06/20/2008 6:30:51 PM PDT by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pillut48

And don’t you just KNOW that if oil WAS discovered to be plentiful in any of those areas, suddenly the govt would step in and declare it to be a “protected wetland” or national park or some crap like that.


38 posted on 06/24/2008 4:29:33 AM PDT by a real Sheila (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson