[canuck_conservative]

But it's a free market.

You're funny, Huck.

First you say he has a right to say what he wants [correct], then "it's a free market" - i.e., private publications can run his stuff if they so choose [correct again] ... BUT THEN you try to get others to join you on your little intimidation crusade to try any blacklist Pat from being published .... yikes.

Censorship is not a good idea .... but if you like it so much, perhaps you'd be more at home living in Russia or Communist China?

[Huck]

BUT THEN you try to get others to join you on your little intimidation crusade to try any blacklist Pat from being published .... yikes.

Get a grip. First of all, I'm not suggesting "intimidation." I'm suggesting giving conservative publications, who theoretically serve our cause, constructive feedback. What intimidation? I'm not suggesting anything other than expressing an opinion. It'd be totally up to them of course what to do about it.

Second, as I pointed out several times, he's free to be published wherever they'll have him. Your hysterics are comical, but misplaced. As consumers of conservative publications, we have every right and perhaps a duty to give feedback, positive and negative, to the publications that supposedly give us voice in the public forum.

Censorship is not a good idea .... but if you like it so much, perhaps you'd be more at home living in Russia or Communist China?

LOL! Sober up!