Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clemenza

It’s not ‘loopiness’; it’s paleo-conservatism that calls for a restoration of the constitution and a limited foreign policy. I’ll echo Pat: A Republic, not an Empire.


184 posted on 06/20/2008 10:33:00 AM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: sobieski

Some of the theories being floated on this thread makes Pat look rational.


186 posted on 06/20/2008 10:36:20 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

To: sobieski
There is an alternative to Pat's blind ideological loyalty to Borah/Taft foreign policy, which is Realism.

I truly believe that the rise of China and India will see a return to old school balance of power politics. Folks should stop listening to fools like Hannity who talk about "World War IV" and a "new cold war" and instead brush up on their Metternich and Kissinger.

A mulipolar world will bring a greater degree of order than the "crusader state" envisioned by the neoconservatives, whose idiotic support of a unipolar world leads to them opposing such positive developments as a European Army (why the hell are we still in Germany?). Nevertheless, the US is already too involved in international polity and economics to advocate the passive neutrality supported by the Paleocons (although Pat himself does not even go that far, I was thinking more of the Chronicles crowd).

191 posted on 06/20/2008 10:39:32 AM PDT by Clemenza (No Comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson