Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hardline archbishops declare Anglican split
Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12:33AM BST 19/06/2008 | By Tim Butcher in Jordan and Martin Beckford

Posted on 06/18/2008 5:52:49 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Last Dakotan

Most of the Africans are from the Evangelical side rather than the Anglo Catholic side. The Pope probably won’t pick up many folks there.

On the other hand, he could pick up a number in England as that branch fractures over women bishops and homosexual ‘marriages’ by the Anglican clergy.


21 posted on 06/18/2008 9:53:07 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

While I can understand claiming the Anabaptists and Waldensians, I would be leery of claiming the Albigensians, who were nearly Gnostics.


22 posted on 06/18/2008 10:07:56 PM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

It’s one of the built-in prejudices of the MSM. They can’t just let the truth be the truth; their business model does not allow it. They have to keep the pot stirred.


23 posted on 06/18/2008 10:41:39 PM PDT by Mmmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

IMO, comforting illusions about life are less believable in Africa; what Christianity you will find over there is “meat and potatoes,” because in brutal circumstances the warmed-over stuff just looks and sounds stupid.


24 posted on 06/18/2008 10:56:05 PM PDT by Mmmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
Yeah it would be about time, but things may not be as the Telegraph is reporting them. Greg Griffith at Stand Firm writes of the document in question:

"Stand Firm is also in possession of this document, and while I haven't scrutinized the entire thing, I think it's accurate to say that those parts pertaining to the fractured nature of the communion are more descriptive than they are prescriptive. They state the obvious - granted, in unusually articulate and foreboding prose - but they do not go so far as to declare a schism as the Telegraph claims. The purpose of the document appears to be more to frame the discussions that will take place in Jerusalem, not to declare anything in the way of an official schism.

"While further examination upon the release of this document may reveal something different, prudence requires that I warn everyone not to proceed from the assumption that this document declares - and thus GAFCON will open with - a declaration of an official schism."

Here is a link to a .pdf of the document in question. I haven't read it yet, so you can judge for yourself.

25 posted on 06/18/2008 11:31:07 PM PDT by Zero Sum (Liberalism: The damage ends up being a thousand times the benefit! (apologies to Rabbi Benny Lau))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Danrec
You could not be more wrong. I heard the same stories you have, and I investigated this question thoroughly before we joined the Church.

The news media hates the Catholic church because it is the last large, organized stronghold against abortion and homosexual 'affirmation'. Therefore the media spreads these stories, and those who already dislike the Church, or are ignorant of its actual teachings, believe them.

Here's what actually happened -- Certain bishops in the Church succumbed to the zeitgeist of the 60s and 70s, and as a result ordained homosexual priests who promptly 'chickenhawked' teenaged boys (as one would expect). Then they believed the psychotherapists who told them these guys could be 'cured' - instead of adhering to long-standing Church law, and sent the homosexuals for 'treatment' and then reassigned them. Stupid (and disobedient) but they believed in "modern science".

John Paul II was handicapped by his experience of Communist governments using false accusations of homosexual conduct to attack Church leaders in Poland, but he began a concerted cleanup and instituted a permanent audit of all dioceses in the U.S. Benedict XVI has accelerated that process. He has also re-emphasized the long-standing (since the 50s) rule that homosexuals or those with homosexual tendencies are not to be admitted to seminary, let alone ordained. And most of the goofy heterodox bishops have been cleaned out, with a few notable exceptions that are so well entrenched that it is simpler to wait for them to retire. But even those bishops have seen the writing on the wall and have changed their ways to some extent (e.g. Mahony of LA).

So your accusations are almost entirely past history. (Meanwhile, of course, the news media ignores ongoing homosexual predation in protestant denominations and especially in the public schools, because it doesn't fit the agenda.)

If you are an evangelical or low church Episcopalian, you will find some doctrinal and liturgical difficulties in the Catholic Church, but those can be dealt with. If you are a high churcher, you will be amazed at how little anything differs from a high Episcopal parish (other, of course, than fidelity to Scripture and Church tradition!)

- speaking as a former high church Episcopalian, sixth generation. We swam the Tiber in 2004 and could not be happier in our new parish. We have a wonderful rector, a faithful, orthodox congregation, and (I was surprised) a great music program.

26 posted on 06/19/2008 5:13:43 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Danrec
The only alternative is to become an Anglican or join one of the Orthodox Churches.

I pray and carefully watch what the new pope is doing.

For over twenty years I have attended the traditional Tridentine mass that was the mainstay of the Roman Catholic Church for centuries.

The evil and perversions wrought in the worship and in the dwindling ranks of the priesthood was caused by two factors: Vatican II and the popes who initiated this aberration and those who nurtured it. This pope appears to have recognized the fact that these changes are not pleasing to God.

About 1950 Stalin recognized that he had two enemies: The U.S.A. and the Catholic Church. There wasn't much to be done to the U.S., beyond larding it's government and other insitutions with spies and moles, but there was something that could be done to the Church: infiltrate it.

The communists did infiltrate the Church and its seminaries, but then those infiltrators decided that the Church could be brought down more quickly with the help of that perverted class known as homosexuals.

Little by little they have been and are still being weeded out. They didn't take their vows seriously. Their intent was to prey upon our children.

I don't have to point out to you that the Anglicans have serious problems, especially when one considers they ordain homosexual and lesbians on a regular basis to the point that true Christian Anglicans are leaving the Church in droves.

27 posted on 06/19/2008 5:37:13 AM PDT by CWWren (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress....but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

What’s interesting here is that this was obviously leaked...why?


28 posted on 06/19/2008 11:19:12 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I don’t believe it was leaked. I just looked at the website and the whole thing is available for digital download.


29 posted on 06/19/2008 1:32:41 PM PDT by Ray'sBeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: StAthanasiustheGreat

That’s the first I’ve heard that. What source are you using?

1 - pg 121; “The Torch of the Testimony”; John W. Kennedy, 1965

2 - History of the Churches; David Cloud, 2002; citing “History of the Ancient Churches of Piedmont and Albigenses”, Allix; 1690/92

You might be using a source that describes a sect that has since become apostate.

By His Grace


30 posted on 06/19/2008 8:33:56 PM PDT by Salvavida (Restoring the U.S.A. starts with filling the empty pew at a local Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

31 posted on 06/19/2008 8:35:42 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWWren

It started way earlier, during the Depression.


32 posted on 06/19/2008 8:37:26 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida
Like many medieval movements, there were various schools of thought and practice amongst the Cathari; some were dualistic, others Gnostic, some closer to orthodoxy while abstaining from an acceptance of Catholic doctrines. The dualist theology was the most prominent, however, and was based upon the complete incompatibility of love and power. As matter was seen as a manifestation of power, it was also incompatible with love. They did not believe in one all-encompassing god, but in two, both equal and comparable in status. They held that the physical world was evil and created by Rex Mundi (translated from Latin as "king of the world"), who encompassed all that was corporeal, chaotic and powerful; the second god, the one whom they worshipped, was entirely disincarnate: a being or principle of pure spirit and completely unsullied by the taint of matter. He was the god of love, order and peace.

From Wiki, so subject to all of the usual flaws, but it tracks quite well with other readings I have done on the matter. Dualism is very Eastern in origin, and has very little connection to traditional Christian beliefs...

33 posted on 06/19/2008 9:01:48 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwæt! Lãr biþ mæst hord, soþlïce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; ...
 EPISCOPAL TURNING POINTS

-- 1976: Women's ordination to priesthood approved.

-- 1989: Barbara Harris is named first female bishop in Anglican history.

--  2003: Openly gay V. Gene Robinson becomes bishop of New Hampshire.

Anglican conservatives plan 'show of force'

34 posted on 06/20/2008 6:10:13 AM PDT by NYer ("Ignorance of scripture is ignorance of Christ." - St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Anglican Communion is fairly small (about 75 million members worldwide) compared to the Catholic Church. However, prior to the mid-1970s Anglicanism was nearly identical to Catholicism in terms of Church hierarchy, etc.

It is my belief that the secular humanist left has spent the past decades using Anglicanism as a “test run” for a future assault against the Catholic Church who they have always seen as the primary target (if for no other reason than the sheer size of the Church). And now we are seeing the left’s recreation of their assault on Anglicanism, beginning with the push to ordain women.


35 posted on 06/20/2008 6:24:11 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NYer
For the record you forgot a big one:

-- 1958: Lambeth Conference removes opposition to artificial contraception.

36 posted on 06/20/2008 6:30:20 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
1958: Lambeth Conference removes opposition to artificial contraception.

That was one of the most important decisions since Martin Luther decided to split with the Church. It was the opening gun in the Sexual Revolution, leading directly to Griswold v. Connecticut, and from there to Roe v. Wade. The Anglican Church was still centrally important back then in the Anglophone world. The WASP Establishment was still ascendant in America, and the 1958 Lambeth Conference was the key cultural turning point. Since then, the Mainline Churches have collapsed, and few people talk about WASPs any more, but back then they were at the center of the Establishment.

As for the current schism in the Anglican Communion, of course it was the American Church--with the complicity of Rowan Williams--that is responsible. It would be one thing to ordain a bishop and then discover that he was a homosexual. It is quite a different thing to deliberately ordain someone a bishop after he has divorced his wife and openly declared himself to be a gay advocate. And to ordain this man for no other reason than BECAUSE he was a homosexual.

37 posted on 06/20/2008 8:19:23 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Hardline = actually Christian.

God bless them!
38 posted on 06/20/2008 8:21:14 AM PDT by Antoninus (Every second spent bashing McCain is time that could be spent helping Conservatives downticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danrec
Why would I join the Roman Church when they have similar problems? They ordain homosexuals regularly.

No, only renegade bishops do that. Does the Episcopal Church have anything like this?

Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders

Here's a direct quote:

"In the light of such teaching, this Dicastery, in accord with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, believes it necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question[9], cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practise homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called "gay culture"[10]."

In light of this, I would ask you to kindly withdraw your previous accusation.
39 posted on 06/20/2008 8:32:58 AM PDT by Antoninus (Every second spent bashing McCain is time that could be spent helping Conservatives downticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; Danrec

< crickets >


40 posted on 06/20/2008 10:32:34 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson